<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.inmediahk.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>香港獨立媒體 - Comments for &quot;必需品&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;必需品&quot;</description>
 <language>zh-hant</language>
<item>
 <title>正!</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1012643</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;花苑, 妳好. 睇左你d畫作好耐, 請問收唔收學生或者開班呀. 有既話, 通知聲呀. 新年快樂!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:58:28 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>沙倫</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1012643 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t know</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001941</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I am just using laser as an example to illustrate art is independent from the tool that used to create the art.  It&#039;s stupidity uneconomical to use laser to create a print while you can use much cheaper tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Re: Mt.  Yes.  Once you formula art into a form, art cease to be an art.  The essence of art is that it has no form.  Forms are just categories created by us for the sake of management.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:34:00 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>hevangel</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001941 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>誰說一定要版畫（一笑）</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001939</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s important is what the 版畫 trying to express. If you achieve the same expression and communicate to the audience, a fart is as good as a 版畫.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clarify: &lt;em&gt;If&lt;/em&gt; the above statement were true, then we shall need no art forms --mt respects the &lt;em&gt;creation&lt;/em&gt; as well as the expression of every art form, and hence doesn&#039;t buy such idea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Edited after Ken Ho&#039;s comment -- 1. corrected a word; 2. added lines to clarify intent.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:31:58 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>mt</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001939 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If...</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001940</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;mt and hevangel:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;If you archive the same expression and communicate to the audience...&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Isn&#039;t that the key question.  And also... why use laser when a piece of metal would do?  And if you can&#039;t even get a right piece of metal to do the job, what are the chances that you can get a more complicated piece of technology to do the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And oh, I think you guys mean &quot;achieve&quot; not &quot;archive&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:05:56 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Ken Ho</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001940 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>毛筆鍋子也只是工具</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;毛筆有軟有硬﹐是因為要寫出不同風格的書法。寫出來的書法表達的東西是目的﹐毛筆只是達到這個目的的工具。若果發明一枝新款毛筆﹐可以同時集合軟硬毛筆的功用﹐寫出來的書法也沒有分別的話﹐毛筆根本不需要分軟硬。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;誰說版畫一定要用刀刻﹖用電腦繪圖加鐳射切割也可以整版畫。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:27:17 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>hevangel</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001938 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>只用鍵盤的人當然不知毛筆有軟有硬鍋子有平有圓</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001925</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;是的花苑。我每回在台灣和日本逛美術用品店，都只有羨慕的份兒。我不迷信所謂民族性，但日本在現代代過程中以德國為師，二者對技藝的注重體現在對每一個細節的嚴緊追求。看Durer的銅版與浮世繪，就知道利害。而技法到了爐火純青忘其所以之後就是道了。到了這個階段，才談用菜刀刻版畫未遲。&lt;br /&gt;
無錢去日本，下回到台，記得幫你帶點材料。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:38:15 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>梁寶</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001925 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>re: ken</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001916</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I took the philosophy of art.  I disagree with the formalism art theory.  For the definition of art, I am an expressionist.  In response to your question, whether the paint use oil or water is irrelevant, what&#039;s important is what the painting trying to express.  If you archive the same expression and communicate to the audience, a laser printer painting is as good as a oil painting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:57:13 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>hevangel</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001916 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;板畫不過是一個外在的形式&quot;?</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001909</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree.  That&#039;s kind of like saying oil paintings and water paintings are the same because they both use colour.  I am in engineering by training so I probably can&#039;t appreciate the subject as much as those from  anthropology, but I thought 形式 is often a very important part of culture and tradition.  Is hevangel suggesting we should just make art on computer and use laser printer?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:56:03 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Ken Ho</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001909 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>網上訂購</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001253#comment-1001898</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;上網買野咁方便﹐香港美術店沒有得賣﹐網上郵寄訂購不就可以了嗎﹖&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;板畫不過是一個外在的形式﹐文化並不拘泥於門面的形式﹐而是著重內在的思維與行動模式。香港其實有自己的文化和傳統﹐只是你置身其中不易察覺罷了。你如果在外國讀過有很多留學生的大學﹐有機會將不同文化背景的人並排比較﹐香港人是有一套很獨特的文化﹐同大陸人台灣人很不相同。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;好奇一問﹐點解你要作板畫﹖是興趣還是工作需要﹖&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:26:24 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>hevangel</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1001898 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


