香港獨立媒體 - Comments for "代貼：善導宗教狂熱，保護弱勢非物質文化遺產"

咬交嚼字

麥記，

在 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary中，hostile 同malice 的解釋都是一樣: hostile - showing ill will or malevolence; malice - enmity of heart, ill will, malevolence。
請解釋什麼是 "area of civil responsibility(6 meters)"。是否教堂才有這責任？
所謂幡竿神位對atheist 及non-believers 的侵擾會否抽象一點？是精神上、視覺上、抑或祇是簡單一句、我唔中意？佢地的見解我們點知呢？不知道上兩星期的大角咀廟會"侵擾"了多少atheist，anti-believers 及non-believers呢？

這些傳統宗教、風俗儀式除非得港官許可一律不准，已經變得久延殘喘。長洲搶飽山變了攀登飽山，普羅大眾的活動變成專業人士的競賽便是一個活生生的例子。

日鹿

Is the location of

Is the location of "幡竿神位" always there since 常豐里老福德宮土地寶誕 was set?
Eager to learn more.

Hostile is not malice

"穿深色西裝的救恩堂同工惡意侵擾進行中的道教晚朝儀式，身體語言充滿敵意，領域行為強烈".....

This cannot be "惡意侵擾", it is okay to say "敵意", but who is the intruder or transgresser? You cannot step to the door of another home and still saying you have been "侵擾".

Erection of several "幡竿神位" is okay, just as every religon has done, but it should not be aggressive as put it with area of civil responsibility (6 meters) outside of a church. That is too hostile and intolerance. Being "非物質文化遺產" does not means erection of relics can be taken as granted.

BTW, I can't understand why erection "幡竿神位" everywhere has not "侵擾" for those who are atheist and non-believers. I think the viewpoint from atheist, anti-believers and non-believers should be considered as well.

香港獨立媒體 - Comments for "代貼：善導宗教狂熱，保護弱勢非物質文化遺產"

咬交嚼字

Is the location of

Hostile is not malice

抓到原圖了!!

圖看不清楚

照片被 auto resize 了