香港獨立媒體 - Comments for "轉載膠文:勿讓以《家暴》、反《淫審》為名行左傾思潮之實"

右翼法西斯扣人帽子說人法西斯。

右翼法西斯扣人帽子說人法西斯。
其實我一向不喜歡用左右翼，因為其空廢。
不過這文用了香港右翼經常做的事：把好的東西都拉到右翼那邊，壞的就全部推給左翼。
在那個人眼中，總之右就是好，左就是不好，和黃世澤真相似。
內容無甚可評，根本就是一堆XX。

Thanks McDonald

這是轉載,不是我寫的,把宗教和政治扯在一起亦不是我做的,而是已經發生了的事,舉例如明光社常常「監察」基督右派政治議程在立法會的發展(性別歧視/家暴條例/淫審條例),又例如基督教在明報賣的廣告有三天是罵社民連不道德,還有聖道迦密中學回條事件,基督教團體在各中小學掛橫額支持網絡廿三條,蘇穎智撐梁美芬參選立法會事件.明光社常常投訴最反共的蘋果日報,明光社教授歪曲了的人權課程,梁燕城牧師常常在文匯報大罵泛民主派及誣陷2.15遊行人仕破壞黃成智辨公室,梁美芬在文匯報要脅香港電台不要發表反對基督右派的言論等(下刪六百字)....

Is that enough evidence?

Correlation needed

I did not read the post from 尤拉 yet, but I have to say Water Pumper's viewpoint has flaw. If there is correlation between religion and politics, it is good to DISPLAY ALL OF THEM. We can examine them one by one to see which correlation is valid and which has no ground.

Politics?

Aren't we putting too much afford on linking up religion and politics?

I don't think we need to add any politics identity to them, just take out their point of view, speak those non-sense out, and things can be much simplified