<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.inmediahk.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>香港獨立媒體 - Comments for &quot;編輯室周記: 宰殺中產的國家資本主義鐵路&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;編輯室周記: 宰殺中產的國家資本主義鐵路&quot;</description>
 <language>zh-hant</language>
<item>
 <title>Egyptians acclimated Papyrus</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1017052</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Egyptians acclimated Papyrus to accomplish Sales letters bargain flights and bank posters. Commercial letters and political Campaign displays &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realtestexams.com&quot;&gt;actual test&lt;/a&gt; accept been begin in the Ruins of Pompeii and Ancient Arabia. Lost and begin Commercial on Hotels Papyrus was accepted in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Bank or Rock Painting for Commercial Commercial is addition appearance of an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examsprovider.com&quot;&gt;exam preparation&lt;/a&gt; Ancient Commercial form, which is present to this Day in abounding Parts of Asia, Africa, and South America. The Painting Tradition of bank can be traced Back to Indian Rock Handbags Art Paintings Back to that date 4000 BC. History tells &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examsprovider.com/650-568.htm&quot;&gt;650-568 exam&lt;/a&gt; us that Out-of-home commercial and billboards are the oldest forms of advertising.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:26:47 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>ping123</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1017052 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Egyptians used papyrus to</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1014344</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Egyptians used papyrus to make sales messages &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flight-searcher.net&quot;&gt;cheap flights&lt;/a&gt; and wall posters. Commercial messages and political campaign displays have been found in the ruins of Pompeii and ancient Arabia. Lost and found advertising on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.staycheaphotel.net&quot;&gt;hotels&lt;/a&gt; papyrus was common in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Wall or rock painting for commercial advertising is another manifestation of an ancient advertising form, which is present to this day in many parts of Asia, Africa, and South America. The tradition of wall painting can be traced back to Indian rock &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.besthandbagsoutlet.com&quot;&gt;handbags&lt;/a&gt;  art  paintings that date back to 4000 BC.  History tells us that Out-of-home advertising and billboards are the oldest forms of advertising.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:39:27 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>sohail</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1014344 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>对过去几十年来，最明显的教训之一是，资本主义是坚不可摧的。</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1014071</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;对过去几十年来，最明显的教训之一是，资本主义是坚不可摧的。马克思比作一个吸血鬼，&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.actual-exams.com/&quot;&gt;braindump&lt;/a&gt;和比较突出的问题之一是，现在似乎总是&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.actual-exams.com/70-433-practice-exam.htm&quot;&gt;70-433 braindump&lt;/a&gt;起来后再次被刺死。即使是毛泽东的尝试，在文化大革命中，消灭了资本主义的痕迹，结束了其凯旋&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.actual-exams.com/A-Plus-Certification-practice-exam.htm&quot;&gt;a plus certification&lt;/a&gt;.今天的左反应对全球资本主义和政治的补充，在一个自由民主的霸权的方式多种多样。它可能，例如，接受霸权&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.actual-exams.com/ASE-practice-exam.htm&quot;&gt;ase practice test&lt;/a&gt;,而是继续为改革争取在其规则（这是第三条道路社会民主主义）。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 11 May 2010 12:25:34 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>danie53595</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1014071 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How about the construction workers themselves?</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010251</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Do they really know what they are supporting?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:12:27 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Ken Ho</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010251 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>工聯會這樣聆聽意見</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010246</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;工聯會支持，並不是因為它相信基建能增加就業，而是聖旨到（或者姨媽到），對佢地有無利都要講成有利啦。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;自己睇片啦，你有野同佢地議員講，佢地係咁樣聽法。我咁佢地一定練成左千里耳，唔在場都聽到清清楚楚。&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66qQuv3Wlbo&quot; title=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66qQuv3Wlbo&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66qQuv3Wlbo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:15:34 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>麥當勞</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010246 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alternative solution will also produce jobs</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010241</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Someone should tell 工聯會 that the alternative solution will also produce lots of construction jobs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:00:23 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Ken Ho</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010241 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>工聯會</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010231</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;工聯會也支持,&lt;br /&gt;
證明它相信基建能增加就業,&lt;br /&gt;
對工人有利,&lt;br /&gt;
看來運動仍未能令工人明白這種發展觀其實對他們也有不利的影響.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:06:40 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Plato</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010231 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>不是改版啊！</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010228</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;係 data base 死咗同網站啲 setting 唔知點亂晒，剛找朋友急救了。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:45:05 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>阿藹</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010228 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>致編輯室: 這改版與舊版相比,是極大退步,且有違民主開放準則</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010227</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;致編輯室: 這改版很失敗,與舊版相比,是極大退步,且有違民主開放準則,敬請糾正!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:44:18 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Fung Huen</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010227 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>致編輯室: 這改版很失敗,且有違民主開放準則.</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010226</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;致編輯室: 這改版很失敗,與舊版相比,是極大退步,且有違民主開放準則,敬請糾正!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:40:26 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Fung Huen</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010226 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>民主黨對高鐡投棄權票,我們也放棄投民主黨票</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005279#comment-1010225</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;（本文原本是一篇獨立文章,但幾番也不能经&quot;專欄文章&quot;途徑上載,請獨媒編輯從速修理為荷!現因時效關係,在此以回應登出.)&lt;br /&gt;
據明報今天(30/11∕09)報道,就高鐵撥款一事,“民主黨交通政策發言人鄭家富表示,由於政府仍未提交足夠資料,故暫時決定投棄權票。”&lt;br /&gt;
民主黨作為須向公眾以至選民負責的政黨,若以「政府仍未提交足夠資料」為理由,而決定投棄權票,是不可接受的。&lt;br /&gt;
首先,在責任上,政府是有不可推卸責任提交足夠資料予立法者作決定,而這也是立法者的基本知情權,所以立法者須維護及爭取之,而不應當只以棄權來回應。試問,你們作為立法者,竟連自己的基本權利也維護不了,反更示之以弱,我們選民又怎能再寄望你們,作為我們的代表,去維護和爭取我們的權益呢!?&lt;br /&gt;
第二,就邏輯而言,若民主黨對政府沒提交足夠資料的反應只是投棄權票的話,那麼日後政府只要數夠票通過一法案,就根本毋須再向民主黨提交有關資料了!這不是自招其辱兼自廢武功,又是甚麼?&lt;br /&gt;
反過來看,政府所提出的支持高鐵理由已被民眾(卻非由民主黨)一一駁倒了,而民主黨亦不曾公開表示過有何其他的支持理由。換言之,香港人民只能認為民主黨並無任何該黨所認可的理由,去支持撥款通過一項會花掉全港人民至少669億(且未計其他種種非金錢所能衡量的代價)的工程。在這分明的情況下,民主黨仍只以棄權而非反對來回應,又代表甚麼呢?&lt;br /&gt;
我敢信,很多香港人也如我般,已不禁懷疑,(且有贊成領滙上市的前車可鑑,更遑論現今在政改-五區總辭上的搖擺立場矣。)民主黨在骨子裏究竟是怎樣的一個政黨?&lt;br /&gt;
民主黨,請用事實來澄清我們的懷疑。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:21:19 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Fung Huen</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 1010225 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


