香港獨立媒體 - Comments for "基督徒「放下手上的石頭」聯署行動"

師叔，請受徒兒一拜

師叔，你好野，請受不肖徒兒小泥彩一拜。你成舊石頭飛過來，將我打成INMedia的暴民一伙，我痛，不過，好似連理據都唔使講播----呢招係唔係擲石神功的高段數招式呢？都幾好使播。要練幾耐？

不過我都明，唔係超級法利賽人，又點可以大聲喝人地不准亂用法利賽人個名？至少證明徒兒無拜錯師。

Inmedia D人好學唔學，學「政治正確」，有一招叫「反污名化」，非常毒辣，殺人於十丈之外。但小泥彩最喜歡將人污名化，想不到師叔都識借力使力，「反污名化」一招就可以唔使理由就擲石，我寫個「服」字。

徒兒讀得書少，學下野遮。不過，師叔話師父其實係「微言大義」，暗有所指，呢招真係好使得。

師叔，可否耐心教導徒兒，點樣教人遊花園，然後話人不懂遊花園其實別有所指。

不肖徒兒敢問：究竟耶穌是因為法利賽人的口述傳統而批評法利賽人，定還是不滿極端主義的、過份保守的法利賽人而罵法利賽人，同「法利賽人」個名點樣被小泥彩用來論證人有擲石和逆視的天賦權利，有乜關係呢？

不肖徒兒敢問：其實小泥彩我都話耶穌同法利賽人都係一擔担，都係喜歡擲石，師叔你都好似話係咁播。你係話佢地其實都好friend，不是嗎？你唔講我就當係喎。斗膽再問，點解我咁長篇論證天賦歧視權，就可以被一skip 而過呢？

{如果呢招其實就係擲石神功的絕招，就唔使答我，我明，係密宗嘛！}

斗膽不肖徒兒小泥彩未解YT派真傳法利賽擲石神功，望師叔指點迷津，蒼生有幸！

不過你如果嫌不肖徒兒 “煩” ，就收埋響心算了，費事inmediaD好事之徒又乘機向你擲石，掟親你老人家就唔好啦！

請首先認識法利賽人，才稱讚或侮辱法利賽人

http://www.inmediahk.net/comments/view-comment?comment%5fid=221835&retur...

全世界擲石者團結起來！

好野 YT，連法利賽人都給博學的 YT平反，好野，好野，我好佩服，難怪你有那麼多粉絲。

耶穌投訴法利賽人，真是千古奇冤！

投訴就己經係暴力啦，衝擊解構人地法利賽人的社會秩序啦，簡直同inmedia呢班de-, post-暴民同一個級數。

耶穌投訴法利賽人向人擲石，你耶穌咪一樣向法利賽人擲石？誰人向人投訴就是向人擲石，亦即是說耶穌也是法利賽人。耶穌那有資格投訴法利賽人呢？(無聊！)

Inmedia呢班人個個扮耶穌，扮正義，其實個個都係法利賽人，想向全世界擲石。法利賽人唔平反，你地有乜資格罵人？(無恥！)

YT要投訴Inmedia，佢一係耶穌，一係法利賽人，YT也要向inmedia擲石，就等如inmedia 要向全世界擲石。所以，全世界擲石者聯盟都應該為法利賽人平反，也即是說做YT粉絲。對嗎？

好可憐的法利賽人啊，你們才是真正被壓迫的民族呀！好像耶穌和inmedia那幫人，都是想剝奪我們這些擲石人的擲石權利，但其實他們都只不過是法利賽人的叛徒。又或者他們都想做超級法利賽人，只有他們才有資格擲石。(卑鄙！)

YT，你的石頭擲得真好真準，不愧為法利賽人的後代。你才是真正的超級法利賽人啊！法利賽人靠把口，oral tradition嘛，YT得 oral tradition 真傳。一口擲石，一石多鳥，耶穌都要收皮！

超級法利賽人萬歲！
YT萬歲！
全世界擲石者團結起來！

Master YT，你的徒兒粉絲，講得對唔對呢？

Poor Pharisees

The vilification of the Pharisees has a long history in the Christian Faith, so long, and so well-guarded, that the Pharisees have all become an icon of legalism, if not of evil itself. So here we read: "法利賽人以「禮教吃人」"; "法利賽人的道德警察姿態". If pointing out another's error, perhaps even somewhat agitatedly, is the hallmark of a "道德警察," then we must concede that Christ Jesus himself is no less a moral policeman: witness what he did when he found money-changers in the House of his Father.

But leaving Christ Jesus aside, Christians, now that they need no longer take the New Testament as the sole authority on what happened in the relevant place and time, need to be a little more fair to the Pharisees: both in what they purposed to uphold, and in why Jesus of Nazareth, Christ or not, challenged them so fiercely. All controversies happened, we need first to recall, in a Jewish context. Around the written Law--the Torah--the Pharisees maintained that there was a valid oral tradition tracing back to Moses, a tradition which contained additional legal stipuations, and interpretations of the written Law, which all Jews ought also to observe. Jesus of Nazareth, and he was not alone in this fight, objected to that so-called oral tradition, asserting that it was all invented by later generations, if not by the Pharisees themselves. But he upheld, meticulously, the validity of the written Law in toto, however burdensome it might be. This conflict between "both the written and the oral" and "the written only" replayed itself in all sound and fury in the Reformation, fifteen centuries after the death of Jesus, which has divided the Western Church even to this date.

The full story about the Pharisees is of course much more complicated. But, poor Pharisees, how much injustice your name has suffered because of the triumph of one very large book!

和平討論踐行公義見證基督推廣天國? 推廣天國?