<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.inmediahk.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>香港獨立媒體 - Comments for &quot;張國棟：道德塔利班情意結&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/275804</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;張國棟：道德塔利班情意結&quot;</description>
 <language>zh-hant</language>
<item>
 <title>很中肯的分析, 但</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/275804#comment-282167</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;張前輩的分析我認為是現下對這個陣營人對為切中要害的理解.&lt;br /&gt;
就是太過&quot;切中要害&quot;, 就更不可能要他們回應了, 或許, 可以這樣說, 就是因為他們無法回應, 才引證了這個情義結, 要看關氏無由言及他物, 近來在時代論壇強解黑奴解放運動與明光社的關係就可見一班.&lt;br /&gt;
however, be regard that the interpretation, They may be accepted or rejected, but they have little or no impact on the patient&#039;s libidinal economy.&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretations that are rejected by the patient (whether they are on target or not) are, when offered in sufficient number, likely to lead a patient to change analysts or leave therapy altogether.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretation has virtually no beneficial effect until the analysand has formulated a true demand for analysis, and the analyst begins to operate as a pure function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;所以, 問題係, 直接把真相告訴他們, 他們根本不可能理解, 問題是, 到底怎樣做, 才可以引導他們反省自己的問題?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:28:24 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>不信</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 282167 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


