<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.inmediahk.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>香港獨立媒體 - Comments for &quot;龍應台：你不能不知道的台灣──觀連宋訪大陸有感──&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;龍應台：你不能不知道的台灣──觀連宋訪大陸有感──&quot;</description>
 <language>zh-hant</language>
<item>
 <title>I said why they left the UK ma!</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-36322</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t say religion had been the (only or main) reason they fought for independence.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:16:52 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Frostig</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36322 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>清教徒</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-36251</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;在舊歐洲混不下去遠走美國十三州是事實, 但搞獨立好似係因為茶葉稅喎, 不干宗教的事.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:02:22 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>錢恨少</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36251 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not a problem of genes</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-35725</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Language and culture-wise, they are Chinese, right.  But if you think of how the present Chinese political power killed most Taiwan people&#039;s ancestors and forced them to leave their land, they have logical reasons to hate China, as Chinese is their eyes is merely COMMUNIST CHINESE, while they themselves were in fact really Chinese.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, trying to cut their own root is stupid, as many overseas Chinese have been trying their best to teach their children Chinese language, tradition and even some Chinese literatures, but we should be considerate.  At least The Americans left Britain just because of religion, but Communist Party DID robb all the power and everything IN CHINA from Nationalist Party and forced all of them to move to Taiwan.  It was like an invasion!  It was a war, if Chinese have reasons to dislike Japanese, the same reasons apply to Taiwanese not accepting Chinese.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:09:19 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Frostig</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 35725 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>台灣有人咩</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-35601</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;所謂台灣人(不計原住民), 大部份咪係明末清初過台海的福建佬的後人, 當時過台海可能由於危險定其他原因, 好少女人跟住來, 所以那些移民大多與土著女人成親, 勉強來說, 可以找到DNA的分別就係咁多. 點計都算係同文同種, 移民的來源比美國的五湖四海冇咁雜, 人地Uncle Sam同老家打過仗才獨起來, 分別是否在這點? 但以今時今日的文明, 有事都係坐低傾好. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;台灣佬有本事唔好用中文, 自己以&quot;台語&quot;玩拼音文字, 睇下你走唔走得出果22個香港咁大的地方.而家呢班友仔已經在大學玩自瀆,只教台灣文學以此去中國化,沒有了源頭活水, 我又放長眼,睇你台灣有什麼文學, 搞來搞去咪又係黃春明,陳映真,白先勇同余光中係中國人, 你唔好計唔該.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:13:32 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>錢恨少</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 35601 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>By the way, Hong Kong people sound just the same?!?!?!</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-35532</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Most good qualities of the taiwanese Ms. Long has stated are also similar to describe HK people, don&#039;t you all think so?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:00:19 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Frostig</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 35532 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>一直沒有把台灣人看成中國人</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-35524</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;他們實在太...太...太不同了。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;不過﹐你也要想﹐台灣人眼中&#039;中國&#039;不是美國人眼中的英國那麼簡單。可以說﹐想想琉球人(老一輩依然不承認&#039;日本&#039;身份)如果紀念日本偉人﹐感覺可好﹖&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:18:51 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Frostig</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 35524 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>感觸在以下的引文</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/35209#comment-35474</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;龍文:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;身為臺北市文化決策者的我，如果致詞時引用了司馬遷或韓非子，會被批為「統派」，意思是對台灣「不忠誠」。為國學大師錢穆和林語堂修葺故居時，我被怒罵質問，「錢林兩人都是中國人，不是台灣人，不可以用台灣人的錢去修中國人的房子！」&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;台灣人忘本同偏狹得都幾利害, 老蔣敗走台灣時, cap唔少中國人的錢, 你唔好嘔番出來, 都未計故宮博物院的國寶. 有冇人認為美加澳紐演講者唔可以引用英國作家的名句, 這是什麼心態? 講真,唔係幾想同呢啲人一齊認做中國人.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:44:13 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>錢恨少</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 35474 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


