<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.inmediahk.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>香港獨立媒體 - Comments for &quot;許寶強：讓學生主導通識學習&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/40910</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;許寶強：讓學生主導通識學習&quot;</description>
 <language>zh-hant</language>
<item>
 <title>Not the QUANTITY, but QUALITY</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/40910#comment-41307</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is not &#039;too much&#039; or &#039;too little&#039; in reform, but the direction.  Supposingly, an appropriate education reform should lessen the admin. workload of the teachers, exactly the opposite direction of the current so-called &#039;reform&#039;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GE is not a bad idea, just how to implement it?  It is a problem, if a subjetc is called &#039;anything in daily life&#039;, I don&#039;t see the possibility to include all the topics a students should know about in lessons.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:27:49 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Frostig</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41307 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>最重要的是不要再過多的教改了！</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/40910#comment-41192</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;無論甚麼教學法也好，也要靠學生主動。現在的問題是排山倒海的教改壓榨老師，老師無空閒時間，自然不能和學生做討論，繁重的教改變相剝奪學生和老師交流的權利。&lt;br /&gt;
另外，怎也要防止通識變成愛國教育！所謂「盡信通識，不如無通識！」，也不要把學生的學識變成半湯不水。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:15:08 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>胡俊龍</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41192 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Exam should not be included.</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/40910#comment-41120</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is like if you focus on a topic to do a research project, then you need to answer questions from ANY aspect......  If it should be student-centred, exams should be totally eliminated, unless the questions are all related to the students&#039; selected topic.  (A bit like defending the thesis...???)  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, instead of STANDARD exam papers and markers from different schools with GIVEN MARKING SCHEMES, I suggest all the projects are marked twice, once by school teachers, once by &#039;marker&#039;, then questions related to the project is asked to make sure that the students have really done the whole thing himself/herself, with thorough understanding.  This method solved two problems; &#039;the possibility to cheat (ask somebody else to do it)&#039;, and the inflexible &#039;English or Chinese COMPOSITION exam&#039;.  In fact, I know it is a bit demanding to the teachers who were trained under the current education system, just it is the only way I can think of for the meantime to achieve the &#039;aim&#039; of GE.  Also, to avoid the inequality between students (esp. the rich and the poor ones), a standard format of the report should be set up, instead of giving some students with more resources to show off.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:10:49 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Frostig</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41120 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>答: 「談何容易?」 </title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/40910#comment-41045</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;其實細讀文章不難搵出隱藏答案, 哪就是許寶強在教改上經常「翻炒」的教.學關係上變革, 消除課室裏面的不平等關係等等如下:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;「......主要是為了改變以往的教育方式：由教育當局和學校設定課程內容，老師決定教學法、進度和評核標準，學生被動地接收知識......議題探究式學習的目的，是培育學生終生學習能力、深化對知識的了解和應用技巧，以學生的興趣、關注作動機，將學生置於學習過程中心，老師只是從旁提供指引和輔助......學生應擁有並掌控整個探究的過程和結果，並學習管理和修正探究學習的步驟。探究式學習應理解和尊重學生發展適合自己的學習方法，哪怕是簡單、帶實驗性的方法，也是良好的學習經驗和發現過程......教學更需要給學生足夠的空間和時間，在過程中令學生感覺安全、自信、受尊重，不會因所知有限而感到羞恥和無價值。因此評核方法應以形成性的評估為主，而非傳統的小測大考等僅僅衡量極為單一的學習結果，並以此來判定成敗。」&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:22:47 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>司徒</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41045 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>要自我評估, 談何容易?</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/40910#comment-41015</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;「形成性評估是重要部份，應在學習前、過程中和後反覆進行。學生如能經常以不同渠道與教師和其他同學討論學習態度、方法、目標，進行自我評估，才是有意義的學習活動，才能在離校後仍能終生學習。」&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;問題一:慣於「被評估」「被分類」的香港學生, 要自我評估, 談何容易?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;二:要教師「以不同渠道」去輔助學生。 第一, work load 問題, 唔係成個curriculum、system去改, 教師根本冇咁既空間去做; 二, e家既教師有既多個有咁既能耐去做? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;層壓性既問題, 有時, 我相信revolution多個reform&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:16:31 +0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>長鬚</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41015 at http://www.inmediahk.net</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


