立即捐款

林鄭開口講大話,唔識扮識

林鄭開口講大話,唔識扮識
廣告

廣告

林鄭答立會問,話政府追加刑期沒有做錯,還叫非建制派議員仔細讀判詞。實情是她無讀判詞,只看其中文譯本。雖則,其中譯本也是由一些法官撰寫,但它不是判詞。

原判詞如下:

E.2 裁判官是否原則上犯了錯誤或明顯地判處不力?

我們並不認為裁判官對這些上訴人的社會服務令和緩刑是在裁判官量刑的合理範圍之外。 由於沒有明顯的不足,上訴法院沒有適當的理由將裁判所考慮的有關因素加以不同的加權。

106.在這些情況下,(律政司向上訴庭)申請審查對上訴人的許可應該被拒絕。

FACC Nos. 8, 9 and 10 of 2017

E.2 Did the Magistrate err in principle or impose manifestly inadequate sentences?

We do not consider that the community service orders and suspended sentence respectively imposed by the magistrate on these appellants were outside the reasonable ambit of the magistrate’s sentencing discretion. Since they were not manifestly inadequate, there was no proper basis for the Court of Appeal to ascribe different weights to the relevant factors taken into account by the magistrate.

106. In these circumstances, the applications for review of the particular sentences imposed on the appellants should have been refused.

廣告