一則關於美國電視檢察制度的討論, 要求晚上10點前不得有女人露出乳頭的鏡頭, 這引來很多媒體工作者的不滿說美國社會因為政治原因越來越高舉清教徒的原則.
他們又質欵為什麼女人乳頭為對被乳頭喂大的孩子有害?
看到這篇討論, 為香港感到唏噓, 這裡已經覺得視檢已是不容置欵的事...
討論之始:
American women have no nipples (before 10 p.m.)
: Pamela Anderson, appearing on Howard Stern this morning to plug her new Fox show Stacked, said that the network censors have come on the set and ordered that her nippled be "taped down" because you can't have nipples before 10 p.m.
This shows the absurd lengths to which regulatory puritanism has gone: Now American women can't have nipples, at least not before the "safe harbor," when, apparently, nipples are suddenly, magically allowed to pop out again.
I say that the NOW should be storming the FCC with protest over this: Because of the chill (which, yes, ironically, would have the undesired effect on nipples) they have imposed, we are now at the point where a woman's clothed anatomy is deemed to be injurious to children. That's childish itself; it's absurd; it's sexist; it's more offensive than any nipple, even Janet Jackson's.
Free the nipples!
接著的討論更有趣