<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.inmediahk.net"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>香港獨立媒體 - 巴黎公社 (1871)</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/500928/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>zh-hant</language>
<item>
 <title>Visualizing History (社會運動電影節: 全球時限)</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005150</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-image&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;img  class=&quot;imagefield imagefield-field_image&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.inmediahk.net/files/column_images/pw01_0.jpg?1258258383&quot; /&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Visualizing History&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;本土成長的荷里活導演吳宇森，回歸中國，拍成了《赤壁》，裡面有很多令人失笑的場面，當然你亦可以選擇大笑：魏軍被困孔明所設的聯軍八卦陣內，成甕中之鱉，關雲長竟然要親自殺敵；又趙子龍身陷險境，周瑜竟可飛身擋箭；趙薇喬裝魏兵，深入敵營，與魏軍起居生活，怎可不被發現？又怎麽能夠有空間繪製長捲軸地形圖而不被揭發；趙薇逃離魏營，引起騷亂，魏軍怎可不上報曹操？小喬身嬌肉貴，怎麽能夠與婢女執杖渡江，與曹操會面？隨便找一個《赤壁》的視訊檔案看看，這樣的不合情理的場面罄竹難書。從這些，我們不難發現吳宇森把《三國誌》或《三國演義》胡亂簒改的決心。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;歷史是用文字冩成的，在石上，在竹上，在布上或在紙上。&lt;br /&gt;
小說是用文字冩成的，在紙上。&lt;br /&gt;
所謂「正史」是某些有權力的人用文字冩成的。&lt;br /&gt;
文字是一個綫性(linear)維度。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;自1895年電影誕生以降，人們開始嘗試將綫性的文字，如小說、歷史等，用影像轉化成四維的空間，改編為電影作品。在visualizing text、visualizing history的過程中，時間、距離、空間、人物、性格，處境等等的合理性顯得異常重要。這個用影像製造出的世界，如果與我們日常接觸的邏輯相悖，就是違反常理；如果與電影自己建構的邏輯相悖，這就是反駁。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;這個要義叫做真實。&lt;br /&gt;
文字的真實。&lt;br /&gt;
歷史的真實。&lt;br /&gt;
塔可夫斯基的真實。&lt;br /&gt;
奇斯洛夫斯的真實。&lt;br /&gt;
高達的真實。&lt;br /&gt;
布烈遜的真實。&lt;br /&gt;
費里尼的真實，等等。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;能夠visualize歷史，前設是要有對歷史有認真的研究。如果沒有日本歷史學家對戰國時代古戰場巨細無遺的研究，黑澤明不可能拍出《影武者》或《蜘蛛巢城》等的電影。到大阪的天守閣看一看，便可知道人家對自己的歷史如何珍而重之。影像與文字構成了有趣的辯證關係，綫性一經轉化為四維空間，文字的謊言自然會跑出來。這關乎到我能不能問，和你會不會願答，及有沒有記錄下來。今天的真實，就是明天的歷史。要找回歷史，就要尋回昨天的真實。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;看Peter Watkins的《巴黎公社，1871》或 Geoff Bowie的《The Universal Clock: The Resistance Of Peter Watkins》，就是看Watkins怎樣把這段被邊緣化的歷史visualize出來。他在拍攝的現場，會問隨隊的歷史顧問：「他們激昂的時候會唱什麼歌？」&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;電影導演要有visualize text的能耐，而觀眾亦要有visualize history的能力，才能洞悉影像背後的謊言。在Watkins形容為monoform的傳媒力量影響之下，大眾這種辨知真偽的能力，日益微薄。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;不打算為Visualizing History改一個中文譯名，因為我們的民族，還沒有這樣的一個概念。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;文 四維出世&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(((((((((((((&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;全球時限&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;The Universal Clock: The Resistance of Peter Watkins &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;導演：Geoff Bowie&lt;br /&gt;
製作：A National Film Board of Canada&lt;br /&gt;
片長：77分鐘&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;去年社運電影節有套殺死人的六小時影片〔巴黎公社，1871〕，你可以視這片為該片的 making of (製作特輯)，但本片也有本片的意義。Peter Watkins通過呼召集體學習及重新演繹一段被遺忘的草民抗爭歷史（巴黎公社）來追縱現代抗爭的意義，以及讓現代人民參與創造歷的意義，而本片則追縱這個過程，並訪問好多個角色，讓他們以自己的日常生活影像與〔巴黎公社，1871〕中的角度互相映照，並再對照全球媒體如何操作「真實」與「歷史」，最後對比出一幅複雜的「真實」圖像，讓你不能不想想：如果每天看到的影像都比「真實」更「真實」時，你又如何？&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
放映時間及地點：&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;- 2009/11/15 (星期日) 晚上19:30&lt;br /&gt;
地點： 學聯社會運動資源中心 (自治八樓)&lt;br /&gt;
地址：香港九龍太子彌敦道739號金輪大廈天台 (始創中心對面 行人隧道旁)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; 第七屆香港社運動電影節&lt;br /&gt;
2009 10-11 影像．感動．思索．行動 就在你與我身邊&lt;br /&gt;
費用全免 極需捐獻&lt;br /&gt;
contact: 8101 2056&lt;br /&gt;
email:smff@riseup.net &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;主辦單位&lt;br /&gt;
自治八樓（學聯社會運動資源中心)&lt;br /&gt;
地址: 旺角彌敦道739號金輪大廈八字A座&lt;br /&gt;
電話: 23977231&lt;br /&gt;
電郵: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:contact@smrc8a.org&quot;&gt;contact@smrc8a.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
網頁:http://www.smrc8a.org&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;影行者 v-artivist&lt;br /&gt;
電郵: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:v_artivist@yahoo.com.hk&quot;&gt;v_artivist@yahoo.com.hk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
網頁: &lt;a href=&quot;http://vartivist.wordpress.com&quot; title=&quot;http://vartivist.wordpress.com&quot;&gt;http://vartivist.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005150#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F/%E5%BD%B1%E5%83%8F">影像</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/5025">歷史</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/505305">pater watkins</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/505306">universal clock</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/500928">巴黎公社 (1871)</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.inmediahk.net/crss/node/1005150</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>彩鳳</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1005150 at http://www.inmediahk.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001088</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-date field-field-&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;日期:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;span class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2008-11-22&lt;/span&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
)影像．感動．思索．行動 就在你與我身邊&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot; title=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot;&gt;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
***************************************************&lt;br /&gt;
巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
彼德．獲健士作品&lt;br /&gt;
製作：13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999/法國/黑白/345分鐘&lt;br /&gt;
中文字幕&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (de Paris, 1871 )&lt;br /&gt;
A Film by Peter Watkins&lt;br /&gt;
Production:13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999 /France/ B&amp;amp;W/345 minutes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot; title=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot;&gt;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;「看! 昨日最後一埸就在這裡拍。」 兩位演員帶著鏡頭(我們)參觀拍巴黎公社的攝影棚。不要以為你看的是製作紀錄，因為攝影機很快便變成公社電視台的記者/攝影師，穿來插去，找人做訪問。對，我是說電視台，你還會在片中看到1871年的電視新聞! 不要誤會這是?劇，彼得．獲建士(Peter Watkins) 比誰都認真和關心社會，也一直致力創新影視 「藝術」。今古交錯是他的疏離手法之一，演員時而扮演公社中的角色，時而做回自己，暢談當下的心情和對角色的看法 ; 這邊廂，一群婦女在公社開會，話題慢慢轉向1999年的法國女性；那邊廂公社的男人談電視，談現代的媒體，談日本的衰落 ; 不同時空的話題，互相對照，迫切而貼身。 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;作為電影社會行動工作者，在 「藝術」 層面屈建士挑戰傳統電影導演權力至上和要觀眾成為被動的消費者那種不民主做法，巴黎公社不錯是由屈建士精心設計和統軍，但要求成員大力參與，骨幹是導演的內容則是大家的，例如片中的重要構成部份－對話和討論---來自演員深入研究角色後結合現實生活中的身份，經驗和想法通過排演獲得，是有控制下的比較民主的集體創作；在社會行動方面他要用巴黎公社那種熱火沖天，為了打做一個更好的世界而不怕犧牲的精神來衝擊時下缺乏承擔沒有改良社會理想的人並且重新檢討今天仍然未能做到的很多當時的改革。所以他一方面疏離觀眾，另一方面又要演員和觀眾參與，留了很多空間和資料讓我們討論 (他雖然沒有言明，但片中所留的很多空位令人聯想1968年阿根廷激進紀錄片《熔爐時刻》 [Hour of the Furnaces]中打字幕暫停，叫觀眾展開討論的做法)，電影中和電影外的討論都是運動的一部分。片中扮演婦女同盟的人後來就組織起來把片中的議題帶到現實生活裡繼續爭取，社會行動巳走出銀幕進入生活。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;巴黎公社是獲建士的巔峰作也是電影社會行動片的典範。其作品政治社會意識之強在英國只有堅．盧治(Ken Loach)差可比擬，實驗性則比彼得．格林威(Peter Greenaway)還多幾分實在。這樣豐富的一部作品遠非幾百字可以言明，如何放映和用這部片已大有學問，還是留待觀眾自己去體會。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Look! Yesterday, the last scene was filmed here.’ Two actors take the camera (us) for a tour of the shooting studio of Paris Commune. Do not think you are watching the making-of of the film, as the camera soon becomes the journalist/cameraman of the Commune TV station, going everywhere to interview people. Yes, I mean the TV station, you will even see the TV news of 1871 in the film too! Do not think it is a farce. Peter Watkins is more serious than anyone and nobody can compare to his concern for the society. He is also devoted to reinvent the film and video ‘art’. Anachronism is one of his alienating skills. Actors sometimes play the roles and sometimes play themselves and talk about their feelings at the moment and how they think of the characters. When a group of women are having a meeting in the commune, the topic slowly shifts to the French women in 1999. The men in the commune talk about TV, the modern media and the decline of Japan . Topics of different times juxtapose. Pressing and down to earth.&lt;br /&gt;
As a film and social activist, Watkins challenged both the art and the social. For art, Watkins challenged the tun democratic practice of having an insurmountable autocratic director and requiring the audience to become passive consumers. Although Paris Commune is delicately designed and led by Watkins, he demands active participation from the actors. The structure was his but yet the the contents were everybody&#039;. For example, the important components of the film –dialogue and discussion – was developed by the actors&#039; in-depth research of the characters, merging the characters with their true self in real life and experiencing and develop their thoughts through rehearsals. Which is a rather democratic collective creation in a controlled manner. For the social, he makes use of the passionate spirit of the Paris Commune – ready to sacrifice for building a better world, to challenge the people without the commitment and the will to improve the society nowadays. He also evaluates many reforms of the Paris Commune which are still not accomplished today. Therefore, he alienates the audience on one hand and requires the participation of actors and audience on the other hand. He leaves a lot of space and data for discussion (He did not actually mention it, but a lot of space implied in the movie is reminiscent of the Argentinean radical documentary, Hours of the Furnaces. In which, the film paused and asked the audience to start a discussion.) The discussion inside and outside the film are parts of the movement. After finishing the Paris Commune, the women playing the Women’s Union in the film organized to carry the issue raised in the film into their real life and continued to fight for it. Social movement steps out the screen and enters life. Paris Commune is the best work of Watkins and an prime example of film activist movies. In Britain, comparable example could only be found in Ken Loach of such strong social and political consiousness in his works. The experimental sense of his works is even more concrete than Peter Greenaway. A work of such richness certainly cannot be described in a few hundred words. How to show and use the film requires great wisdom,already. It’s better to leave it for the audience to feel it themselves. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inside a giant warehouse in a working-class Parisian suburb, Peter Watkins assembles a cast of over 200 non-professional actors (though their amateur status is undetectable). Basing their work upon thorough historical research, they will attempt tore- create the events of March, 1871-the rise and fall of the Paris Commune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (Paris, 1871) explores that famous, brief, romantic, and tragic period when poor and working-class Parisians rose up against the “bourgeois” French national government, which fled the capital and re-established itself in Versailles. As this complex historical drama unfolds, it is also “ covered” by two television news crews – one from “National TV Versailles” which broadcasts the official version of events, the other from “Commune TV,” giving voice to the rebellious Communards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mixing past and present, revolutionary in form as well as content, Watkins’s audacious masterpiece forces us to confront notions of a safe or objective reading of the past, and also to reflect, inevitably, upon the present. No one who meets the challenge of La Commune (Paris, 1871) will be unchanged by the experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;主辦單位：自治八樓(學聯社會運動資源中心)　及　影行者&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by ：autonomous8a (social movement resource centre)　and　v-artivist&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001088#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F/%E5%BD%B1%E5%83%8F">影像</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/5034">社會運動</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1%E6%A8%99%E7%B1%A4/08%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AD%E5%B1%86%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E9%9B%BB%E5%BD%B1%E7%AF%80">08第六屆社會運動電影節</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/500928">巴黎公社 (1871)</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.inmediahk.net/crss/node/1001088</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>彩鳳</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1001088 at http://www.inmediahk.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001087</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-date field-field-&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;日期:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;span class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2008-11-08&lt;/span&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
)影像．感動．思索．行動 就在你與我身邊&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot; title=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot;&gt;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
***************************************************&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;彼德．獲健士作品&lt;br /&gt;
製作：13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999/法國/黑白/345分鐘&lt;br /&gt;
中文字幕&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (de Paris, 1871 )&lt;br /&gt;
A Film by Peter Watkins&lt;br /&gt;
Production:13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999 /France/ B&amp;amp;W/345 minutes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot; title=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot;&gt;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;「看! 昨日最後一埸就在這裡拍。」 兩位演員帶著鏡頭(我們)參觀拍巴黎公社的攝影棚。不要以為你看的是製作紀錄，因為攝影機很快便變成公社電視台的記者/攝影師，穿來插去，找人做訪問。對，我是說電視台，你還會在片中看到1871年的電視新聞! 不要誤會這是?劇，彼得．獲建士(Peter Watkins) 比誰都認真和關心社會，也一直致力創新影視 「藝術」。今古交錯是他的疏離手法之一，演員時而扮演公社中的角色，時而做回自己，暢談當下的心情和對角色的看法 ; 這邊廂，一群婦女在公社開會，話題慢慢轉向1999年的法國女性；那邊廂公社的男人談電視，談現代的媒體，談日本的衰落 ; 不同時空的話題，互相對照，迫切而貼身。 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;作為電影社會行動工作者，在 「藝術」 層面屈建士挑戰傳統電影導演權力至上和要觀眾成為被動的消費者那種不民主做法，巴黎公社不錯是由屈建士精心設計和統軍，但要求成員大力參與，骨幹是導演的內容則是大家的，例如片中的重要構成部份－對話和討論---來自演員深入研究角色後結合現實生活中的身份，經驗和想法通過排演獲得，是有控制下的比較民主的集體創作；在社會行動方面他要用巴黎公社那種熱火沖天，為了打做一個更好的世界而不怕犧牲的精神來衝擊時下缺乏承擔沒有改良社會理想的人並且重新檢討今天仍然未能做到的很多當時的改革。所以他一方面疏離觀眾，另一方面又要演員和觀眾參與，留了很多空間和資料讓我們討論 (他雖然沒有言明，但片中所留的很多空位令人聯想1968年阿根廷激進紀錄片《熔爐時刻》 [Hour of the Furnaces]中打字幕暫停，叫觀眾展開討論的做法)，電影中和電影外的討論都是運動的一部分。片中扮演婦女同盟的人後來就組織起來把片中的議題帶到現實生活裡繼續爭取，社會行動巳走出銀幕進入生活。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;巴黎公社是獲建士的巔峰作也是電影社會行動片的典範。其作品政治社會意識之強在英國只有堅．盧治(Ken Loach)差可比擬，實驗性則比彼得．格林威(Peter Greenaway)還多幾分實在。這樣豐富的一部作品遠非幾百字可以言明，如何放映和用這部片已大有學問，還是留待觀眾自己去體會。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Look! Yesterday, the last scene was filmed here.’ Two actors take the camera (us) for a tour of the shooting studio of Paris Commune. Do not think you are watching the making-of of the film, as the camera soon becomes the journalist/cameraman of the Commune TV station, going everywhere to interview people. Yes, I mean the TV station, you will even see the TV news of 1871 in the film too! Do not think it is a farce. Peter Watkins is more serious than anyone and nobody can compare to his concern for the society. He is also devoted to reinvent the film and video ‘art’. Anachronism is one of his alienating skills. Actors sometimes play the roles and sometimes play themselves and talk about their feelings at the moment and how they think of the characters. When a group of women are having a meeting in the commune, the topic slowly shifts to the French women in 1999. The men in the commune talk about TV, the modern media and the decline of Japan . Topics of different times juxtapose. Pressing and down to earth.&lt;br /&gt;
As a film and social activist, Watkins challenged both the art and the social. For art, Watkins challenged the tun democratic practice of having an insurmountable autocratic director and requiring the audience to become passive consumers. Although Paris Commune is delicately designed and led by Watkins, he demands active participation from the actors. The structure was his but yet the the contents were everybody&#039;. For example, the important components of the film –dialogue and discussion – was developed by the actors&#039; in-depth research of the characters, merging the characters with their true self in real life and experiencing and develop their thoughts through rehearsals. Which is a rather democratic collective creation in a controlled manner. For the social, he makes use of the passionate spirit of the Paris Commune – ready to sacrifice for building a better world, to challenge the people without the commitment and the will to improve the society nowadays. He also evaluates many reforms of the Paris Commune which are still not accomplished today. Therefore, he alienates the audience on one hand and requires the participation of actors and audience on the other hand. He leaves a lot of space and data for discussion (He did not actually mention it, but a lot of space implied in the movie is reminiscent of the Argentinean radical documentary, Hours of the Furnaces. In which, the film paused and asked the audience to start a discussion.) The discussion inside and outside the film are parts of the movement. After finishing the Paris Commune, the women playing the Women’s Union in the film organized to carry the issue raised in the film into their real life and continued to fight for it. Social movement steps out the screen and enters life. Paris Commune is the best work of Watkins and an prime example of film activist movies. In Britain, comparable example could only be found in Ken Loach of such strong social and political consiousness in his works. The experimental sense of his works is even more concrete than Peter Greenaway. A work of such richness certainly cannot be described in a few hundred words. How to show and use the film requires great wisdom,already. It’s better to leave it for the audience to feel it themselves. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inside a giant warehouse in a working-class Parisian suburb, Peter Watkins assembles a cast of over 200 non-professional actors (though their amateur status is undetectable). Basing their work upon thorough historical research, they will attempt tore- create the events of March, 1871-the rise and fall of the Paris Commune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (Paris, 1871) explores that famous, brief, romantic, and tragic period when poor and working-class Parisians rose up against the “bourgeois” French national government, which fled the capital and re-established itself in Versailles. As this complex historical drama unfolds, it is also “ covered” by two television news crews – one from “National TV Versailles” which broadcasts the official version of events, the other from “Commune TV,” giving voice to the rebellious Communards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mixing past and present, revolutionary in form as well as content, Watkins’s audacious masterpiece forces us to confront notions of a safe or objective reading of the past, and also to reflect, inevitably, upon the present. No one who meets the challenge of La Commune (Paris, 1871) will be unchanged by the experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;主辦單位：自治八樓(學聯社會運動資源中心)　及　影行者&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by ：autonomous8a (social movement resource centre)　and　v-artivist&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001087#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F/%E5%BD%B1%E5%83%8F">影像</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/5034">社會運動</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1%E6%A8%99%E7%B1%A4/08%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AD%E5%B1%86%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E9%9B%BB%E5%BD%B1%E7%AF%80">08第六屆社會運動電影節</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/500928">巴黎公社 (1871)</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.inmediahk.net/crss/node/1001087</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>彩鳳</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1001087 at http://www.inmediahk.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001086</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-date field-field-&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;日期:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;span class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2008-10-25&lt;/span&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
)影像．感動．思索．行動 就在你與我身邊&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot; title=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot;&gt;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
***************************************************&lt;br /&gt;
巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
彼德．獲健士作品&lt;br /&gt;
製作：13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999/法國/黑白/345分鐘&lt;br /&gt;
中文字幕&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (de Paris, 1871 )&lt;br /&gt;
A Film by Peter Watkins&lt;br /&gt;
Production:13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999 /France/ B&amp;amp;W/345 minutes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot; title=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot;&gt;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;「看! 昨日最後一埸就在這裡拍。」 兩位演員帶著鏡頭(我們)參觀拍巴黎公社的攝影棚。不要以為你看的是製作紀錄，因為攝影機很快便變成公社電視台的記者/攝影師，穿來插去，找人做訪問。對，我是說電視台，你還會在片中看到1871年的電視新聞! 不要誤會這是?劇，彼得．獲建士(Peter Watkins) 比誰都認真和關心社會，也一直致力創新影視 「藝術」。今古交錯是他的疏離手法之一，演員時而扮演公社中的角色，時而做回自己，暢談當下的心情和對角色的看法 ; 這邊廂，一群婦女在公社開會，話題慢慢轉向1999年的法國女性；那邊廂公社的男人談電視，談現代的媒體，談日本的衰落 ; 不同時空的話題，互相對照，迫切而貼身。 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;作為電影社會行動工作者，在 「藝術」 層面屈建士挑戰傳統電影導演權力至上和要觀眾成為被動的消費者那種不民主做法，巴黎公社不錯是由屈建士精心設計和統軍，但要求成員大力參與，骨幹是導演的內容則是大家的，例如片中的重要構成部份－對話和討論---來自演員深入研究角色後結合現實生活中的身份，經驗和想法通過排演獲得，是有控制下的比較民主的集體創作；在社會行動方面他要用巴黎公社那種熱火沖天，為了打做一個更好的世界而不怕犧牲的精神來衝擊時下缺乏承擔沒有改良社會理想的人並且重新檢討今天仍然未能做到的很多當時的改革。所以他一方面疏離觀眾，另一方面又要演員和觀眾參與，留了很多空間和資料讓我們討論 (他雖然沒有言明，但片中所留的很多空位令人聯想1968年阿根廷激進紀錄片《熔爐時刻》 [Hour of the Furnaces]中打字幕暫停，叫觀眾展開討論的做法)，電影中和電影外的討論都是運動的一部分。片中扮演婦女同盟的人後來就組織起來把片中的議題帶到現實生活裡繼續爭取，社會行動巳走出銀幕進入生活。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;巴黎公社是獲建士的巔峰作也是電影社會行動片的典範。其作品政治社會意識之強在英國只有堅．盧治(Ken Loach)差可比擬，實驗性則比彼得．格林威(Peter Greenaway)還多幾分實在。這樣豐富的一部作品遠非幾百字可以言明，如何放映和用這部片已大有學問，還是留待觀眾自己去體會。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Look! Yesterday, the last scene was filmed here.’ Two actors take the camera (us) for a tour of the shooting studio of Paris Commune. Do not think you are watching the making-of of the film, as the camera soon becomes the journalist/cameraman of the Commune TV station, going everywhere to interview people. Yes, I mean the TV station, you will even see the TV news of 1871 in the film too! Do not think it is a farce. Peter Watkins is more serious than anyone and nobody can compare to his concern for the society. He is also devoted to reinvent the film and video ‘art’. Anachronism is one of his alienating skills. Actors sometimes play the roles and sometimes play themselves and talk about their feelings at the moment and how they think of the characters. When a group of women are having a meeting in the commune, the topic slowly shifts to the French women in 1999. The men in the commune talk about TV, the modern media and the decline of Japan . Topics of different times juxtapose. Pressing and down to earth.&lt;br /&gt;
As a film and social activist, Watkins challenged both the art and the social. For art, Watkins challenged the tun democratic practice of having an insurmountable autocratic director and requiring the audience to become passive consumers. Although Paris Commune is delicately designed and led by Watkins, he demands active participation from the actors. The structure was his but yet the the contents were everybody&#039;. For example, the important components of the film –dialogue and discussion – was developed by the actors&#039; in-depth research of the characters, merging the characters with their true self in real life and experiencing and develop their thoughts through rehearsals. Which is a rather democratic collective creation in a controlled manner. For the social, he makes use of the passionate spirit of the Paris Commune – ready to sacrifice for building a better world, to challenge the people without the commitment and the will to improve the society nowadays. He also evaluates many reforms of the Paris Commune which are still not accomplished today. Therefore, he alienates the audience on one hand and requires the participation of actors and audience on the other hand. He leaves a lot of space and data for discussion (He did not actually mention it, but a lot of space implied in the movie is reminiscent of the Argentinean radical documentary, Hours of the Furnaces. In which, the film paused and asked the audience to start a discussion.) The discussion inside and outside the film are parts of the movement. After finishing the Paris Commune, the women playing the Women’s Union in the film organized to carry the issue raised in the film into their real life and continued to fight for it. Social movement steps out the screen and enters life. Paris Commune is the best work of Watkins and an prime example of film activist movies. In Britain, comparable example could only be found in Ken Loach of such strong social and political consiousness in his works. The experimental sense of his works is even more concrete than Peter Greenaway. A work of such richness certainly cannot be described in a few hundred words. How to show and use the film requires great wisdom,already. It’s better to leave it for the audience to feel it themselves. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inside a giant warehouse in a working-class Parisian suburb, Peter Watkins assembles a cast of over 200 non-professional actors (though their amateur status is undetectable). Basing their work upon thorough historical research, they will attempt tore- create the events of March, 1871-the rise and fall of the Paris Commune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (Paris, 1871) explores that famous, brief, romantic, and tragic period when poor and working-class Parisians rose up against the “bourgeois” French national government, which fled the capital and re-established itself in Versailles. As this complex historical drama unfolds, it is also “ covered” by two television news crews – one from “National TV Versailles” which broadcasts the official version of events, the other from “Commune TV,” giving voice to the rebellious Communards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mixing past and present, revolutionary in form as well as content, Watkins’s audacious masterpiece forces us to confront notions of a safe or objective reading of the past, and also to reflect, inevitably, upon the present. No one who meets the challenge of La Commune (Paris, 1871) will be unchanged by the experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;主辦單位：自治八樓(學聯社會運動資源中心)　及　影行者&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by ：autonomous8a (social movement resource centre)　and　v-artivist&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001086#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F/%E5%BD%B1%E5%83%8F">影像</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/5034">社會運動</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1%E6%A8%99%E7%B1%A4/08%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AD%E5%B1%86%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E9%9B%BB%E5%BD%B1%E7%AF%80">08第六屆社會運動電影節</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/500928">巴黎公社 (1871)</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.inmediahk.net/crss/node/1001086</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>彩鳳</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1001086 at http://www.inmediahk.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)</title>
 <link>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001085</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-date field-field-&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;日期:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;span class=&quot;date-display-single&quot;&gt;2008-10-18&lt;/span&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;08第六屆社會運動電影節--巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
)影像．感動．思索．行動 就在你與我身邊&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot; title=&quot;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&quot;&gt;http://smrc8a.org/smff/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
***************************************************&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;巴黎公社 (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;彼德．獲健士作品&lt;br /&gt;
製作：13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999/法國/黑白/345分鐘&lt;br /&gt;
中文字幕&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (de Paris, 1871 )&lt;br /&gt;
A Film by Peter Watkins&lt;br /&gt;
Production:13 Production, La Sept Art, Musée d&#039;orsay&lt;br /&gt;
1999 /France/ B&amp;amp;W/345 minutes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot; title=&quot;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&quot;&gt;http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/commune.htm#avail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;「看! 昨日最後一埸就在這裡拍。」 兩位演員帶著鏡頭(我們)參觀拍巴黎公社的攝影棚。不要以為你看的是製作紀錄，因為攝影機很快便變成公社電視台的記者/攝影師，穿來插去，找人做訪問。對，我是說電視台，你還會在片中看到1871年的電視新聞! 不要誤會這是?劇，彼得．獲建士(Peter Watkins) 比誰都認真和關心社會，也一直致力創新影視 「藝術」。今古交錯是他的疏離手法之一，演員時而扮演公社中的角色，時而做回自己，暢談當下的心情和對角色的看法 ; 這邊廂，一群婦女在公社開會，話題慢慢轉向1999年的法國女性；那邊廂公社的男人談電視，談現代的媒體，談日本的衰落 ; 不同時空的話題，互相對照，迫切而貼身。 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;作為電影社會行動工作者，在 「藝術」 層面屈建士挑戰傳統電影導演權力至上和要觀眾成為被動的消費者那種不民主做法，巴黎公社不錯是由屈建士精心設計和統軍，但要求成員大力參與，骨幹是導演的內容則是大家的，例如片中的重要構成部份－對話和討論---來自演員深入研究角色後結合現實生活中的身份，經驗和想法通過排演獲得，是有控制下的比較民主的集體創作；在社會行動方面他要用巴黎公社那種熱火沖天，為了打做一個更好的世界而不怕犧牲的精神來衝擊時下缺乏承擔沒有改良社會理想的人並且重新檢討今天仍然未能做到的很多當時的改革。所以他一方面疏離觀眾，另一方面又要演員和觀眾參與，留了很多空間和資料讓我們討論 (他雖然沒有言明，但片中所留的很多空位令人聯想1968年阿根廷激進紀錄片《熔爐時刻》 [Hour of the Furnaces]中打字幕暫停，叫觀眾展開討論的做法)，電影中和電影外的討論都是運動的一部分。片中扮演婦女同盟的人後來就組織起來把片中的議題帶到現實生活裡繼續爭取，社會行動巳走出銀幕進入生活。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;巴黎公社是獲建士的巔峰作也是電影社會行動片的典範。其作品政治社會意識之強在英國只有堅．盧治(Ken Loach)差可比擬，實驗性則比彼得．格林威(Peter Greenaway)還多幾分實在。這樣豐富的一部作品遠非幾百字可以言明，如何放映和用這部片已大有學問，還是留待觀眾自己去體會。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Look! Yesterday, the last scene was filmed here.’ Two actors take the camera (us) for a tour of the shooting studio of Paris Commune. Do not think you are watching the making-of of the film, as the camera soon becomes the journalist/cameraman of the Commune TV station, going everywhere to interview people. Yes, I mean the TV station, you will even see the TV news of 1871 in the film too! Do not think it is a farce. Peter Watkins is more serious than anyone and nobody can compare to his concern for the society. He is also devoted to reinvent the film and video ‘art’. Anachronism is one of his alienating skills. Actors sometimes play the roles and sometimes play themselves and talk about their feelings at the moment and how they think of the characters. When a group of women are having a meeting in the commune, the topic slowly shifts to the French women in 1999. The men in the commune talk about TV, the modern media and the decline of Japan . Topics of different times juxtapose. Pressing and down to earth.&lt;br /&gt;
As a film and social activist, Watkins challenged both the art and the social. For art, Watkins challenged the tun democratic practice of having an insurmountable autocratic director and requiring the audience to become passive consumers. Although Paris Commune is delicately designed and led by Watkins, he demands active participation from the actors. The structure was his but yet the the contents were everybody&#039;. For example, the important components of the film –dialogue and discussion – was developed by the actors&#039; in-depth research of the characters, merging the characters with their true self in real life and experiencing and develop their thoughts through rehearsals. Which is a rather democratic collective creation in a controlled manner. For the social, he makes use of the passionate spirit of the Paris Commune – ready to sacrifice for building a better world, to challenge the people without the commitment and the will to improve the society nowadays. He also evaluates many reforms of the Paris Commune which are still not accomplished today. Therefore, he alienates the audience on one hand and requires the participation of actors and audience on the other hand. He leaves a lot of space and data for discussion (He did not actually mention it, but a lot of space implied in the movie is reminiscent of the Argentinean radical documentary, Hours of the Furnaces. In which, the film paused and asked the audience to start a discussion.) The discussion inside and outside the film are parts of the movement. After finishing the Paris Commune, the women playing the Women’s Union in the film organized to carry the issue raised in the film into their real life and continued to fight for it. Social movement steps out the screen and enters life. Paris Commune is the best work of Watkins and an prime example of film activist movies. In Britain, comparable example could only be found in Ken Loach of such strong social and political consiousness in his works. The experimental sense of his works is even more concrete than Peter Greenaway. A work of such richness certainly cannot be described in a few hundred words. How to show and use the film requires great wisdom,already. It’s better to leave it for the audience to feel it themselves. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inside a giant warehouse in a working-class Parisian suburb, Peter Watkins assembles a cast of over 200 non-professional actors (though their amateur status is undetectable). Basing their work upon thorough historical research, they will attempt tore- create the events of March, 1871-the rise and fall of the Paris Commune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;La Commune (Paris, 1871) explores that famous, brief, romantic, and tragic period when poor and working-class Parisians rose up against the “bourgeois” French national government, which fled the capital and re-established itself in Versailles. As this complex historical drama unfolds, it is also “ covered” by two television news crews – one from “National TV Versailles” which broadcasts the official version of events, the other from “Commune TV,” giving voice to the rebellious Communards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mixing past and present, revolutionary in form as well as content, Watkins’s audacious masterpiece forces us to confront notions of a safe or objective reading of the past, and also to reflect, inevitably, upon the present. No one who meets the challenge of La Commune (Paris, 1871) will be unchanged by the experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;主辦單位：自治八樓(學聯社會運動資源中心)　及　影行者&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by ：autonomous8a (social movement resource centre)　and　v-artivist&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1001085#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F/%E5%BD%B1%E5%83%8F">影像</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/5034">社會運動</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1%E6%A8%99%E7%B1%A4/08%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AD%E5%B1%86%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E9%9B%BB%E5%BD%B1%E7%AF%80">08第六屆社會運動電影節</category>
 <category domain="http://www.inmediahk.net/taxonomy/term/500928">巴黎公社 (1871)</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.inmediahk.net/crss/node/1001085</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>彩鳳</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1001085 at http://www.inmediahk.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


