香港獨立媒體 - movie

轉載: 歲月神偷: 鞋字半邊難?

尤拉 — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:36:17 +0000

鞋的右半是佳字的左半，即圭;

但它的左半是革命的革，而不是艱難的難的左半邊。

半佳半難奉為圭桌，不可以言革命。

不知「歲月神偷」導演是不是為了避免觸及中共國的河蟹社會禁區，所以革命就不要談，只談凡事半易半難式的虛無哲學?還是他在等待有人看出他對現在香港「和諧心態」的嘲諷?社會和諧到連革命的革字也看不出?

鞋的正確解析反映了中共國及香港的實況，在官方的意識形態中，有鞋穿你就是佳，平民生活之難他們是看不到的，這樣只有革命，才會有更佳的前景。

和諧社會抑或是和鞋社會，即人人只能穿全部一式一樣的鞋子，由官方代理人像電影中的女主角來把一切不合理、不公義、不公正的事合理化，凡事只要相信官方的一套便成，他停建居屋是為你好，八成強折更加是為你好;要是你還沒有信心，可以去問一問中國基督教會恩福堂的梁美芬、蘇穎智如何只要信，不要問!

連結網址:

http://futuremind-euler.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-...

轉載: 歲月神偷: 鞋字半邊難?

尤拉 — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:35:03 +0000

(編緝救命，我想刪除本文，唔想掉人現眼!)

鞋的右半是佳字的左半，即圭;

但它的左半是革命的革，而不是艱難的難的左半邊。

不知「歲月神偷」導演是不是為了避免觸及中共國的河蟹社會禁區，所以革命就不要談，只談凡事半易半難式的虛無哲學;

還是他在等待有人看出他對現在香港「和諧心態」的嘲諷?社會和諧到連革命的革字也看不出?

鞋的正確其式反映了中共國及香港的實況，只有革命，才會有更佳的前景。

連結網址:

http://futuremind-euler.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-...

About Noah’s Ark

尤拉 — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:24:03 +0000

(From: http://eulertruthbible.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/about-noahs-ark/)
(Use common sense to rebuttal what HKSAR spent millions taxpayer's money to prove.)
(用常理去看看所謂挪亞方舟的事實，花掉納稅人幾百萬公帑的馬灣創世公園根本不值一駁，香港是如此的有創意?把神話當事實，把6四事實反而當神話?)

(全譯沒有心機，只譯重點:
香港最近上了一套叫挪亞方舟的電影，根本是美國基右想把明明是神話寓言的事「升格」為事實，以假亂真，香港居然有人信以真，簡直痴線。挪亞方舟本源於一份德國報紙的愚人節的笑話，基右弄假成真，以致世上的基督教徒都成了被嘲笑的對象，信者果然是愚人!

我的質疑為，如果真有挪亞方舟一事:
1. 挪亞一家如何實際上執行把當時全世界所有的物種各取一對的任務?物種小說也有過百萬之多，以挪亞一家的知識、能力及當時的技術條件，如何維持牠們在船上的正常生活也成問題，不要忘記還有數以千計肉眼看不到的細箘及微生物，還有病毒?如何搜集，如何管理?
2. 世界各民族不少都有大洪水的記載，但是和聖經創世記一樣，都稱它民族是世界唯一的生還者，在邏緝上不可能全部為真，必有一真一假，除非這些記載都是由它民族中心出發，所以自然當其他民族死清，因此即全部都是假話，包括聖經的挪亞方舟。
3. 全世界人類豈不是都是挪亞一家的子孫?如此一定可以由DNA檢驗出，何解到今天還沒有具體的證據證明呢?
4. 全世界人類不單都是挪亞一家的子孫，而且一定是由亂倫所出，因此人類DNA的同質性會十分高，發揮不了有性繁殖改良血統的作用，為什麼當時頻頻發生的瘟疫沒有令人類絕種呢?
5. 我無記錯的話，挪亞方舟的故事是在聖經創世紀附近，主流基督教都以為創世紀是一個比擬和寓言，並非真有其事，除非是超有智慧的基督教原教旨主義者只懂一字一句讀聖經，是他們發現了什麼來證明創世紀原來真有其事?

通識教育的好題材，該電影想好一點是真心膠，想差一點是大話連篇，存心欺騙!)

In the midst of busy affair, I always remember to write to my friends.
There is Christian friction movie go mainstream on air in HK a few
days ago. The name is ‘Noah’s Ark’. Now I realize human stupidity
(like universal suffrage under People’s Republic of China) is indeed
infectious. The naivety of American Christianity spread like wild
fire. It is amazing that many HK smart citizen would fall into traps
that some barely literate Chinese would found ‘humorous’. The movie is
pretending to be a fact. The so-called found ark is a April Fool’s
Joke first appear in a German newspaper, you may call it a setup by
humanist to making fool of Christian: They create these so-called
evidence of Biblical Truth (I don’t quite get the difference between
Biblical Truth and Truth, how true is truth here?). Okay, assume they
really did found something. It only demonstrate how lack of
intelligence of this explorer.
Question: 1. Is the event of collection a pair of each animal
happened during the supposing Noah’s Ark event PHYSICALLY possible?
Question: 2. Since many legend talk about a great flood, and each
nation’s legend often have their own ancestor in the place of Noah’s
family, so who did survive? Or we all think other doesn’t survive
except our own race? Certainly all of them can’t be true at the same
time.
Question: 3. If this event is true, we should all able to trace our
DNA back to a single ancestor, how does this very important evidence
hold up in research? However, remember you can’t prove an antecedent
by providing its consequence. Unless you are making up logic like me
do, ha, this is just my theory.
Question: 4. If all of us are coming from the same ancestor, then
we fall into the category of incest. As we don’t have new blood in the
gene pool, the only consequence would be the degradation or decrease
in variability of human race as a whole, it would indeed be a miracle
that plaque and virus doesn’t wipe out humanity.
Question: 5. If my Biblical memory do hold up, I believe this story
is found close to the book of creation. Obviously the story of
creation has to be an analogy, except the ultra intelligent
fundamentalist. It is reasonable to assume that story is also an
analogy.

This would be an excellent material for liberal education. I thought
myself is one of those minority who lack common sense(I do), can’t
tell east from west. This movie, at best, is a honest mistake; at
worst, it is an attempt to deceive. FUD for unchurched people? If this
logic is right, then we may expect PRC’s deny of democracy in HK is
indeed for the sake of HK future.

The Reconstruction of female in a Male-dominated society

尤拉 — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:00:52 +0000

When I was studying in USA, I observe that the dramas and movies are dominated by male themes like violence, causal sex. What sadden me is in a society which has a long traditional of gender equality; while in the Television, not just male is evaluating female via external qualities like looks and body but female is also portrayed as evaluating male in the same way male evaluate female. It appears to me that female is losing their femininity in their quest to become equal with male. Why is not the other ways around given female usually has longer life than male?

I remember how shocked I am when I realize that female has a different cognitive process in evaluating their suitor. The first time I seriously considering the possibility that internal qualities like personality, intelligence, sense of humor, wealth could be attractive in the same sense that external qualities like bodies and looks attractive to male. It appears to me that the process for male probably bear a closer relationship with sexual arousal than female. How is the alternative process possible? How is the process different from that of male?

In any sense, it would be of value for male to learn from the way which female choose their suitor. It appears to me that external qualities of anyone only hold their charm for relatively shorter time compare to the charm of internal qualities to female. Therefore, it sadden me much to see how the whole US society
is turning everyone into animal of sexual arousal, but care nothing about Philosopher. So USA culture only concerns about how to get the other sex to agree to your proposal of marriage; but not the content of the marriage.

連結網址:

http://eulertruthbible.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/th...

針對電影《崖上的波兒》的投訴信兩篇

尤拉 — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:36:31 +0000

(轉載自:news://news.3home.net/497ab56f$1@news.3home.net)

致影視處:

本人乃是「浪子回頭」的基督徒，自幼隨家人返教會，近二十年，但後來受不了魔鬼的誘惑，離開了教會，離開了耶穌基督，過著沉淪的罪人生活，如今已「覺今時而昨非」重新歸向主之懷抱。我們基督徒抱的是一顆耶穌基督的心，「願萬民得救，不願一人沈淪」。我曾經沈淪過，所以我知到耶穌基督乃是惟一的道路，若不是藉著主基督，沒有人能到父的天堂去。所以聖經乃是世上惟一的真理。有見近日社會上的色情資訊氾濫，侮淫侮盜，不單為了滿足成人荒淫，更要荼毒我們單純的下一代，我實在看不過眼。
近日上映的合家歡賀年電影《崖上的波兒》(下簡稱：崖波)，實在是近期「教壞細路」的代表作：

1. 《崖波》片名意淫，當一位女士站立的時候，其腹無疑就如一幅山崖，而崖上的波兒，明顯意有所指，其心可誅。
2. 《崖波》片中，說及一個五歲的小孩愛上一條魚，片中主角宗介更大膽言明：「不管波兒是魚還是半人魚…都喜歡他」，這明確地是有意鼓吹人獸交。
3. 如果《崖波》能是「第一類別」的電影，無疑是間接認同人獸交，如果認同了人獸交，就是主張有性無類，那麼就等於認同同性性交，認同了同性性交就等於鼓吹同性戀，鼓吹同性戀也就讓同性戀無止境擴張，那麼人類就會絕種。聖經上清楚記載所多瑪城滅亡的故事，如果讓《崖波》成為「第一類別」電影，誓必引致地球大爆炸。
4. 教會經常接到貓、狗、金魚、螞蟻等等的救助，表示曾受不同程度的性騷擾，如遭主人強迫觀看其自瀆。因此我們經常要提供心理輔導，如果讓《崖波》在香港上映，實在會大大增加我們前線工作人員的負擔，火頭愈多，我們救火的人便愈辛苦，乞求大家不要再放火。

人獸交在任何地方都是不可接受的，更是違反香港法律，《崖波》實在比「四仔」有過之而無不及，不單不應是合家歡電影，更是不應讓其流通。我們知道所有情慾的罪都是由眼目而來，故此政府應大力監管資訊的流通，建議回復文革時代的樣板戲，維護我們香港的核心價值，基督教不可踰越的道德標準。

關心香港幸福
特別是我們下面個代的
老虔基督徒谷精上腦謹啟

明光社／蘇穎智牧師：

本人XXX乃一介平民，欲對最近上畫的電影《崖上的波兒》作出嚴厲投訴，影視處將這套電影評為一級電影並容許上映實在大錯特錯，本人希望借助貴社／閣下的人際網絡宣揚此片的禍害，發起公眾要求將《崖上的波兒》重新評定為「淫褻」，不得播映及在市面流通。

我認為應《崖上的波兒》淫褻的因由如下：

1)片名意淫。當一名女士站立時，其腹部有如一幅山崖，「崖上的波兒」明顯另有所指，其心可誅。
2)片中主角宗介提到不管波兒是魚還是半人魚都喜歡牠，這是明刀明槍鼓吹人獸交。
3) 容許《崖上的波兒》以一級電影上畫，無疑是間接認同人獸交，認同人獸交即是主張有性無類，那麼同性性交也就變得合理，認同同性性交即是鼓吹同性戀，鼓吹同性戀即是容許同性戀的擴張，這絕對破壞了一男一女的源遠流長的家庭傳統。萬一同性戀和人獸戀因此逐漸成為主流，更有可能招致人類絕種。

情慾的罪孽均由眼目而來，《崖上的波兒》的意識比所謂「四仔」有過之而無不及，不但不應是合家歡的一級電影，更不應容許其流通。此荼毒人心的電影上畫至今已個多星期，為免更多市民被此片精神污染，此片實在應該盡早被禁播。

素養貴社／閣下捍衛道德價值一向不遺餘力，因此敬請貴社／閣下透過會員和教友的網絡轉達《崖上的波兒》如何蠱惑人心，動員多些人出來譴責這套掛羊頭賣狗肉的電影。

小市民XXX上

＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊－＊

明光社
info@truth-light.org.hk

蘇穎智
patrick.so@yanfook.org.hk

影像串流:

See video

影像串流:

See video