立即捐款

轉載: 為什麼YOUTUBE刪片關你的事?

(轉載自: http://euler.truthbible.net/index.php?entry=entry090120-011912)

如果你是無神論者,YOUTUBE刪片明顯是以為我們一盤散沙好欺負,(就我所知)相反就不敢GLBT的短片分毫,以為基右財雄勢大,又得到香港建制派的撐腰,泛民主派有道德包腑,不敢亂說亂動,更有望取悅中共,把「不穩定因素消滅在萌牙狀態」,望有一天在中共國內開設分站,如此政治正確的事,本少利大,為何不挑最弱的來欺負?明光社一衆基督右派聯同YOUTUBE已踩到我們頭上,還不爆發,更待何時?

如果你是GLBT社團的一員,無神論者獲YOUTUBE如此厚愛,成為首個被完全消音的案侈,還不是為了表達對GLBT的人道關懷?痛心基督右派在家暴條例的盲目不仁和偽君子?此短片除了用聖經以「子之矛攻子之盾」外,提出了聖經內有亂倫故事的事實,有什麼色情/暴力/引人犯罪的內容?如果如此的內容,純綷因為和基督右派意見不同,就不容於全世界最自由的互聯網路空間,更何況一些被主流社會視為「更激進」的同志神學內容?或同志小說?

如果你是基督教徒,想一想YOUTUBE刪片背後的邏緝及心態是什麼?我們只是借聖經來表達對香港時事的看法,順帶可以說是對某一派基督徒的意見, 同時可以勉強說成對聖經的一種解讀。因我們和在基督教中的當權者看法不同,就立刻遭封殺,如果他日你不同意基督教教會對時事的看法(如性工作者,性權,香港的民主發展,教會內的貪污腐敗),你很自然會用聖經的說話來表達自己的意見,YOUTUBE可以用同樣的邏緝及心態,因你對聖經的一種解讀不同主流,所以意見自動被消音,你想見到這樣的一天嗎?

如果你是政治上的保守派,想一想YOUTUBE刪片是促進香港社會和諧,還是為火藥味本來極重的家暴條例爭議火上加油?現在世界經濟不景,香港特區的管治權威望每下愈況,激進左派勢力如日中天,YOUTUBE由美國自由派把持,是真正想幫香港特區忙,還是想幫倒忙?幫手推倒香港特區的統治?

如果你是自由派,自由被攻擊,還不挺身而出?今日是無神論者,明天可以激進人仕,後天可以泛民主派,再後天連罵陳冠希都不可以?香港本來已有內容審查制度,時常鬧出「有殺錯,無放過」(如秋天的童話)的笑話,我們可以讓互聯網僅存的一點點自由被削去嗎?

如果你是泛民主派支持者,自由是民主發展的基石,沒有表達不同意見的自由,沒有渠道讓非主流的團體發聲,民主會不會發展成「多數暴政」,甚至成為法西斯主義的溫床呢?今次YOUTUBE統綷是因我們和主流社會對聖經的見解不同,就急於「政治正確」,把異見消滅在萌牙狀態,他日會不會以同樣手段為爭取民主普選的網民消音,令傳媒/互聯網意見一面倒向親建制派,來保證2012的民主普選由親建制勝出?

Why should you concern about banned Bible animation?

If you are atheist, clearly this is a cause for concern. YOUTUBE banned the animation because ATHEIST are a minority in the world, therefore they can do whatever they like to us. Let's demonstrate to them how ‘minority’ are us!

IIf you are an Atheist, clearly this is a cause for concern. YOUTUBE banned the animation because ATHEIST are a minority in the world, therefore they can do whatever they like to us. Let’s demonstrate to them how POWERFUL is when we are united!

If you are part of GLBT community, you are also the minority in the majority of countries; YOUTUBE would have the same mindset toward your group. Moreover, YOUTUBE can use the excuse of contain ADULT and SEXUAL material to prohibit your from expressing yourself in video.

If you are Christian, then YOUTUBE prohibited you from expressing your opinion using Biblical passage, and they can proceed to use excuse of violent and adult content to prohibit ANY PART OF BIBLE appear in YOUTUBE;

If you are non-Christian but a religious person; surely they can find some part of your ‘Holy Book’ inappropriate to some groups of people in the world. If YOUTUBE doesn't like your religion, that is the precedent they follow;

If you are liberal, it is clear that our society can't survive without adequately informed citizen. By banning this animation, YOUTUBE demonstrates that it has the means to make anyone submit to its opinion, and this time the opinion of YOUTUBE is ‘Bible is moral’.

If you are conservative, don't you think that one day the tide may turn against you. And when your OPINION is unpopular(like Pro-Gun and Pro-Death penalty), you opinion would disappear from YOUTUBE just like ours?