寫文章時細看政府的發展計劃﹐才發現你們本土行動的設計是完全行不通的﹐因為你們忘記了P1路。P2路只是臨時路﹐用幾年就會拆變回公園﹐在地底下的P1路才是發展的核心。起P1又要原地保育皇后﹐不知又要花多幾錢。

另外我發現原來市中心重建計劃中﹐包括一幅解放軍總部的用地﹐所以才會有解放軍碼頭。本土行動的朋友不要打摩地大廈這集紙老虎了﹐反對興建解放軍總部這集真老虎吧﹗

我地從來無反對過P1路，保留碼頭對P1完全沒有影響．問題根本唔係錢，保留灣仔街市１４億，政府／市建都在考慮了，完地保留皇后，立法局文件都話幾億搞掂晒，重置與原地保留，連政府條數都係差一兩億！

P1 is main Central Wanchai bypass which is a tunnel lay along the seafront under where claimed to be seafront plaza , and the military pier outside of Queen's Pier (not touching QP at all.)

P2 was never said a temp-road , as on the other side of the road, there will be hotels and shops. I don't see any reason why road is not need in order to feed those hotels and shops. So I don't believe P2 is temp-road.

In order to preserve QP, there need to modify current reclamation conctract to leave the pier area either un-finished or allow open tender to commence preservation structure along the reclamation if they insist to complete the reclamation within the target time.

Or government can also pay current contractor the full payment without finishing the job. This is the best solution for all. As Planning for CRIII development did not complete the social impact study when the project was being planned. Government only plan time, money and technique required to imply the reclamation. The project did not study the social cost for the reclamation.

For the time being, there need only budget to preserve the Pier in situ, which can be as little as less than 1billion( the HK$50,000 budget to cut the pier apart, it should be spent on keeping the pier in situ.Money and Technical is not a problem in QP's case.)or as much as we want to spend depending how far we want to go. IF we want to build the lagoon around it. There might need a bit more. But if it is only for preserving the pier in situ. It doesn't cost. The most difficult thing for government to do is to propose land exchange for the PLA pier to be built else where to China.