日前有地產商向城規會申請，將大坑道4-4C號（下稱「此項目」）重建成三十層高住宅，並計劃將山後原有綠化地帶改為私家車道，出入口建議改設於優雅閣與大寶閣之間。經過專家審閱有關文件及與專家到場評估後，本處發覺，若不及時阻止工程，對周邊環境影響深遠。
A real estate developer has applied to the Town Planning Board for planning approval of constructing an “Access Road and Associated Works for Residential Development” over government land zoned as green belt. After a review of the relevant documents by experts and an assessment on site, we found that, if the project is not stopped in time, it would have far-reaching impacts on the surrounding. environment.
【聯署網址】
城規會的諮詢限期將於7月15日（星期五）屆滿，若能阻止此次申請，地產商便需要重新設計此項目。
The Town Planning Board's consultation deadline is 15 July, 2016. If we manage to ground the application, the developer would have to re-draw this project.
請大家盡快加入聯署，向城規會反映意見，並請將訊息發放至左鄰右里及其他市民，以群眾壓力，迫使城規會作出重視公眾聲音的決定。
We urge everyone to join our petition and reflect your opinions to the Town Planning Board. Also, spread this message to your neighbors and other citizens. Demand the Town Planning Board to make a decision that respects and values the public's opinion.
致城市規劃委員會主席及委會
香港北角渣華道333號
北角政府合署15樓
傳真：2877 0245
電郵：[email protected]
有關的規劃申請編號 ： A/H6/80
各位委員：
《反對香港大坑道 4-4C 號及毗連政府土地住宅發展的擬議行車通道及相關工程》（下稱「此項目」）
我等強烈反對其申請 —— 原因如下：
一、地產商欲佔用公眾綠化地帶興建豪宅以牟取暴利，方會向城規會申請將毗連的政府土地作「住宅發展的擬議行車通道及相關工程」 用途；
二、經專家審閱有關文件及到場評估後，我們發覺，若不及時阻止工程，將對周邊的環境影響深遠；
三、為求得到更好景觀，地產商將樓宇建築在平台之上，把樓高100米住宅，從海拔23米提升至海拔73米。為達成目的，才需要於大坑道70號大寶閣旁興建私家車路，以連接平台。然而，這絕非此項目設置出入口的唯一方案。
四、社區要為此項目付出沉重的代價：大片綠化地帶將因而消失，近50棵樹木會被砍伐。而高聳入雲的建築會製造陰影，籠罩周邊地區及遮擋景觀。勵德邨道迴旋處的交通經已飽和，此項目將令其超出負荷。
五、此項目欲佔用政府公地，但無意帶來社會效益。地產商僅擁有1,946平方米土地，卻「獅子開大口」向政府索取1,950 平方米土地，改作私人車道及私家園林。 地產商貪得無厭，只為賺盡收益，卻犠牲了鄰近上千居民的生活環境。
六、大坑道彎多而路窄，學校林立，住宅眾多，交通流量本已飽和；為期七年大型工程計劃及來往的重型車輛，勢必長期令大坑道交通超出負荷。另外地產商為提高物業價值，計劃設置兩層停車場共46個私家住客車位及5個訪客車位。預見落成後，將帶來極多私人車輛，令繁忙交通更添負擔，加劇交通擠塞。
七、地產商根本毋需將大坑道4－4C行車出入口遷到大坑道70號。事實上，改動出入口只會為繁忙的勵德邨道迴旋處更添擠塞，將來入伙的住戶亦會身受其害。留用現有出入口，將更有效舒緩迴旋處現時的擠塞情況。
八、我等譴責地產商時駿有限公司（深圳市中洲投朮控股股份有限公司持有），董事姚日波及尹善峰作此申請。簡而言之，這是一條詭計，為使地面水平提高五十米，使到自己房產有更好的景觀和賣得好價錢，不惜嚴重損害附近居民的福祉。
二零一六年七月六日
Hong Kong, 6 July 2016
Chairman and Members
Town Planning Board
15/F, North Point Government Offices
333 Java Road, North Point, Hong Kong
Fax: 2877 0245;
Email: [email protected]
Related Application No. A/H6/80
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Re: Planning application A/H6/80 No. 4-4C Tai Hang Road and adjoining Government Land
We strongly object to the captioned application – our reasons are as follows:
1. Developer wants to occupy green belt in Tai Hang for luxury apartments and applied to the Town Planning Board for planning approval of constructing an “Access Road and Associated Works for Residential Development” over government land zoned as green belt.
2. After a review of the relevant documents by experts and an assessment on site, we found that, if the project is not stopped in time, it would have far-reaching impacts on the surrounding environment.
3. The 100m residential development is proposed to be built on the new podium such to seek a better viewsight. The podium would effectively change the height of the ground level of Tai Hang Road 4-4C from 23mPD to 73mPD. This is the only purpose of the proposed access road next to Trafalgar Court at Tai Hang Road 70, however it is not the only option for the entry of the building.
4. The public cost of the proposal is enormous: A large green belt would disappear, up to 50 trees will be removed, an excessive tall building will create a shadow over many surrounding developments and block sightlines, and traffic would increase at the already saturated roundabout of Lai Tak Tsuen Road and Tai Hang Road near the Hong Kong True Light Middle School.
5. The proposed use of government owned green belt serves no public purpose. The developer seeks to increase its lot of 1,946 square meters with another 1,950 square meters of government land for the access road and a private garden. It is simply a voracious proposal to maximize development gain at the cost of the local living environment of thousands of residents.
6. The traffic impacts of the 7-year construction and the subsequent use will be serious. The narrow winding Tai Hang Road aligned with schools and residential buildings is already saturated. The additional traffic will worsen congestion.
7. Changing the car park entrance from Tai Hang Road 4-4C to next to number 70 on top of the slope is unnecessary. In fact, keeping the entrance at the current location will spare the already congested Lai Tak Tsuen Road roundabout from new traffic demand.
8. We condemn the developer Century Shiner Limited, a subsidiary of Shenzhen Centralcon Investment Holding Co. Limited, and the directors Ribo YAO and Shanfeng YIN for this making this application. It is simply a ruse to be able to lift the podium level by 50 meters above the existing ground level to improve the views and the values of the planned new development at great cost to the local neighbourhood.
發起者 Initiator：
楊雪盈（灣仔區議員） Clarisse Yeung, Wan Chai District Councillor
司馬文（創建香港有限公司行政總裁） Paul Zimmerman, CEO, Designing Hong Kong Limited