去了嶺大的UOP(Undergraduate Orientation Programme),感覺真不好受。
是三日兩夜的Camp。日間只有兩日半的時間,但總共聽了超過九個鐘的講座,要聽甚麼是博雅教育、學習英式餐桌禮儀、要撇除港式英語發音、要學習被性騷擾應找校內那些層層疊疊的委員會、要學習理財﹝即除生活所需外,甚麼也不買﹞,還要重新學習拍拖、打扮、不要download BT、不要整影印書、寫paper時怎樣寫reference、學業要求…
好得很。好就好在官方把他們心目中嶺南學生的模,在兩日半、九個鐘、包括十三個talk的時間內,高效率的包裝好,再向五六百個freshman 傾銷。我不禁問:這就是校方給我們的見面禮?
坐在Hall 內足足九個幾鐘的感覺是如何呢?感覺可以用玩甚麼饑饉三十來形容。一來覺得,在窄窄的座位、在不環保的寒冷冷氣中,俾校方車輪戰咁輪,當然係聽到想嘔同想死。再認真D形容我的感覺,成九個幾鐘聽咁多既talk,仲要只是建構官方的嶺南學生模樣,很多時根本同一般年青人的生活有嚴重落差。但是,我只有乖巧的繼續坐著,和五六百個新生繼續合力成為講者或活動設計者眼中的受眾。
對,我們新生想甚麼、感覺如何、看法如何、進大學想做甚麼、平常的生活是甚麼過、為何這樣過生活等,永遠都只屬「台下」的、竊竊私語的、要再教育的。「台上」的、對著咪的、西裝畢正的,就是正統,就應該灌輸給新生。
九個多小時的講座,又像個閱兵儀式:新生被檢閱、被灌輸、被社教化。在台上的,不斷把自我澎脹,澎脹專業、權威、高品味﹝特別英國紳士的品味﹞的自我。而個別講員的風趣和Gag,以及我們全場五六百位新生的捧腹大笑,其實都只是這種自大、不理學生感受的setting的嗎啡。
回應
真正意義
UOP 的真正意義在於它是一場做給外界看的公關 show,用作證明/宣傳/證實嶺大著重博雅教育/注重對新生的品質管理(quality control)。君不見每年開學之時,傳媒在搜括各大院校o'camp 的醜聞時,總會同時見到嶺大『正氣健康』的UOP 報導?
今年連教院都學了這一套,不過只得其形不得其神,以為這個O'camp 真的是為了同學而搞,而幾乎沒有傳媒報導,這實在是捉錯用神了。
這叫博雅教育.......
我對此是大有保留,我真不相信這就叫博雅教育。
UOP
那一些講座可能未必對你有用處,但不代表對他人也沒用
說不定有朝一日你也會在學校受性騷擾,不知怎好;
傳媒的正面報導對你對學校也有好處,而且lingnan u還很young,必須繼續宣傳
現在你親身認識LU還不到半個月,要鬧衰LU似乎還是未夠說服力。
或者,你就用一個觀望開放的態度來生活一個學期,在十二月以一個真正嶺南人的身份去評價LU好不好?
I don't find any problem, frankly.
It sounds interesting, although a bit boring. At least I think that it is helpful for the coming years' study. I mean, at least, referencing is the most important thing a HK student should learn before getting in university. By the way, 'orientation' means something like 'guiding', showing the 'direction', in fact, what else do you expect? And why? You think that the school should tell you how and when to break the school rules without notifying the school? Or tell you which carteen is the cheapest or with the tastiest food? The more practical things should be experienced and experimented by yourselves, even though not against the will of the school management.
Maybe what you mean is that three days is not enough for so many information, then I may agree, but if they ask you to spend too many days in all the 'official orientation activities', you wouldn't have enough time to do your own orientation in your own way. If I were a teacher, I should make sure all my students know some basic rules in the school, just to facilitate their own studies, not any of the others' benefits...... I doubt if any student would read the student handbook, and I suppose that's why the school needed to present all these by talks, instead of leaving them to yourselves to read. If you don't TELL them and them they don't know, they would complain and justify why they didn't know it. Frankly, if all students can 'handle' themselves properly, and be independent, I see no point why the school would have done that. It is not only for marketing, if you ask me.
I suppose you are a good student, in one aspect or another, but not all students are. I have been making it too clear here already, just in case you don't understand...... You have to think in another angle, another perspective. I have met too much uni students who can't even take care of themselves. Perhaps when you meet them, you understand the good will of the school in arranging such boring talks. Bear in mind that the people who gave the talks would also think that it was boring, normally.
呢個好玩
理大迎新男女玩鼻尖傳芥末 新 聞 — 本 港 新 聞
【 本 報 訊 】 大 學 迎 新 的 活 動 內 容 近 年 屢 遭 非 議 , 今 年 理 工 大 學 轄 下 的 香 港 專 上 學 院 迎 新 日 ( Pre O'Camp ) 的 遊 戲 亦 被 指 不 雅 , 有 學 生 指 期 間 以 鼻 尖 相 碰 傳 送 芥 末 的 遊 戲 , 令 男 女 新 生 有 緊 密 身 體 接 觸 , 工 作 人 員 更 當 場 預 告 迎 新 營 將 有 更 多 刺 激 遊 戲 , 「 讓 男 同 學 開 心 一 番 」 , 因 而 令 學 生 不 安 。 學 生 會 主 席 回 應 指 , 當 中 可 能 是 溝 通 上 的 誤 解 , 新 生 對 遊 戲 內 容 感 不 安 , 可 拒 絕 參 與 。
學 生 會 主 席 稱 有 參 加 自 由
有 香 港 專 上 學 院 的 學 生 投 訴 , 指 迎 新 日 的 遊 戲 有 異 性 的 身 體 接 觸 , 例 如 以 鼻 尖 相 碰 傳 送 芥 末 , 迎 新 營 的 學 生 會 工 作 人 員 更 當 場 詢 問 男 同 學 是 否 感 到 興 奮 , 並 指 正 式 的 迎 新 營 將 會 有 更 多 刺 激 遊 戲 。
理 大 香 港 專 上 學 院 學 生 會 主 席 謝 燦 輝 證 實 , 周 日 舉 行 的 迎 新 日 有 鼻 尖 傳 送 芥 末 的 遊 戲 , 由 於 當 日 有 七 十 名 工 作 人 員 , 不 排 除 有 人 曾 說 過 這 些 話 , 惟 說 話 的 意 思 可 能 是 新 生 與 工 作 人 員 之 間 的 誤 解 。 學 生 會 已 向 新 生 派 發 指 引 , 若 對 遊 戲 內 容 感 不 安 , 可 拒 絕 參 與 。 他 表 示 , 若 有 新 生 因 而 感 不 安 , 他 願 意 致 歉 。
理 大 發 言 人 指 , 至 今 沒 收 過 學 生 投 訴 , 迎 新 營 由 學 生 會 籌 辦 , 校 方 尊 重 學 生 會 的 自 主 權 。 校 方 已 提 供 指 引 , 提 醒 學 生 注 意 節 目 不 能 有 意 識 不 良 、 低 俗 品 味 、 涉 及 性 別 歧 視 的 題 材 , 並 建 議 籌 辦 者 避 免 舉 辦 「 出 位 」 遊 戲 , 如 Happy Corner 。 校 方 得 悉 投 訴 後 , 曾 與 學 生 會 緊 密 聯 繫 , 原 已 安 排 老 師 參 與 迎 新 營 , 學 生 會 亦 會 重 新 審 視 迎 新 營 遊 戲 。
回應F
可以考慮的是UOP的權力問題:
校方是用其權力,強迫新生出席一個又一個他們可能認為沒有用的講座(Show?);我不知道今年如何,只知道上年不參加的話要有合理理由作書面解釋(有沒有人知道如果不這麼做會有甚麼後果?),15個ILP更是不用說了。(ILP = Integated Learning Point,LU 學生要夠75分才可畢業。) 我們可以討論,校方這樣運用其權力是否合理?
例外,用「鬧衰」二字是用得不太合適吧~
批判地過大學生活
i石只是對天外飛仙般的主題和太單向的學習方式頗有微言,批評嶺南以此作見面禮,我不認為有太快給出結論。
嶺南大學你在做甚麼? 回應〈嶺大O camp 劫後餘生記之一〉
看i石兄的嶺大O camp 劫後餘生記之一,我深深對嶺南大學的做法十分不滿。不滿的是一所自稱推行博雅教育的大學,連基本大學的理念也不明白。在此,筆者想介紹一篇文章給陳坤耀教授閱讀,是龍應台博士的〈幼稚園大學〉(見〈野火集〉) 。
早於1985年,龍應台博士已經看到大學不應將大學生當幼稚園學生。教育者繼續「哺育」當大學生,只會做成惡性循環。大學正正是大學生甩掉奶咀的時候,讓我們的大學生從身成為有獨立分析和自主自決的個體。
i石也給校方的見面禮﹗
兩年前自己也是UOP的座上客,兩年後看見I石給校方的見面禮(你的文章),雖然我也認同陳景輝:不要太快下結論,畢竟這個活動之中,有部份內容是很值得討論,例如為何不要整翻版書,是因為正版書太貴,令學生唱少左k,還是我們不同意書本的生產過程,又或者問知識是「誰」的產權?書本太貴,對誰有利,又令誰失去了接觸智識的機會?再進一步去問的,是正在使用公共資源的大學圖書館,為何只供開放給學生,而公眾卻無權享受這個智識寶藏?
又例如嶺大一方面傳授拍拖性生活秘技予新生,同時又要壓抑同學在宿舍的私人性生活,連如何使用避孕套的討論也要左閃右避,嶺大傳授的,是怎樣的價值觀?
這些都是值得新同學思考,進而跟校方討論,struggle的話題,也是我在嶺大三年目睹的怪現象。
我同意不應太快下個結論。然而,看見新同學敢言的一面,簡直要拍手稱興﹗但不要為此而滿足,因為I石兄在嶺大未來三年的日子,將會是一段漫長的革命。
給李卓倫
李兄,你repeat左幾次回應,可否delete左重複果幾篇呢?謝謝
一般年青人的生活?
Have you ever tried to 'imagine' that MAYBE, PERHAPS... 一般年青人的生活 is not healthy, is not the best way to spend our time, our life, our youth??????
Just MAYBE......
Sorry!
領男兄,
我delete 不到, 你可否待勞?
答案和問題
多謝大家豐富了我這篇小記,幫我由uop後即時的思緒,推多一步。
很多時,迎新活動都是在給答案。但這些答案,當同學真要實
踐校園生活時會如何看待呢?以影印書為例,大家會否聽完講座﹝可以包括政府的宣傳﹞後,就人人守法唔整影印書?還是你有你講,我有我靜靜雞去繼續整?再還是這議題,可以像領男兄問的那些問題,可以在校園內重見天日,重新挑戰那些答案?
如果答案只是沒人理會的答案,只是不能進一步問下去的答案,那麼便只是擺上台給人恭奉的答案,那有何意義?那豈不是變校方和學生都在過日辰的局面嗎?
Only suggestions
I believe, if you see it from another angle, it is totally different, Issac.
If you know that a child would not follow totally the rules, are you prepared not to tell them any of them at all? They are just giving advises and suggestions, trying to convince you by giving reasons (whether you think they are reasonable or not), just because they treat you all as adults. Do you think that because they believe the students wouldn't follow all the rules and regulations, so they should simply save their breath and let you do whatever you want? For me, this is not education.
Remember the story of a thief biting her mother after getting the sentence? He wasn't told that stealing was wrong when he was small, so his fault was also his mother's fault. Why you have to see the kind suggestions as 'answers' to some possibly inexistant question?
In contrast, your '靜靜雞' has given the answer. Why '靜靜雞', why not openly? If you never knew that it should not be done, why you would '靜靜雞' do it? Maybe you won't listen immediately, but it has already had some impact on you. We can't demand people to change their point of view and behaviour just like that, we need time. The important thing is that, you should think about what you have heard and understand it, then ask yourself what is correct and what is not. In U already, students should have independent thinking, guidelines are given, you are the one who is responsible to THINK! So, next time when you 靜靜雞 photocopy the books, you remember what you were told and your conclusion on this matter. Also, ask yourself why you still do it when you need to 靜靜雞 do it.
Well...
It is such an interesting discussion. I was at the Lingnan UOP, too, and I find it rather boring at times, too. But dear shek, perhaps, perhaps, that is why we need to be "educated", to be "fed" with this and that kind of knowledge, etc. because "educated" persons, i think, do not "complain" simply of such things. Outspoken is different from "freedom and liberty". What we should ask is, perhaps, why didn't some of the speakers prepare better, and with their true heart, to let us know what IS liberal arts education - even if it's only an induction? Some of the lectures are just so-called "handing in exercise for the sake of handing in exercise", like what we do as students... between "kindergarten style" education and "adult style" education, there's always a difficult line to draw...
and by the way, Mr. Lee, kindly do not quote 龍應台anymore, she's just another BS in the end. thank you.
大家心目中的理想ocamp是怎樣的呢?
如題
博雅源於對話,單向豈能稱博雅?
尤其見內容包括英餐禮儀及撇除港式英語,更讓人懷疑這是不是博雅教育,雖容易教人想起英國紳士,但豈能稱為博雅 (陶傑之流除外)。
我想若要辦個較好的,也許可用話劇形式 (模仿古希臘),讓學生看看不同理念下的人生觀,從而在思考中選擇,或對故有的生活踐習進行反省。總較單向灌輸 liberal 吧!
Agree with 阿丙, BUT
For 500 to 600 students, how can they arrange interactive activities? Also, regarding the teaching staff, I doubt if anybody is able to do such 'lectures'. Only if they invited some drama groups or specialists they could possibly do something similar.
And also, I personally believe that things like table manners aren't 'unnecessary', as it is just a small detail of 'politeness' and 'courtesy', rather basic, but not being pretentious or anything like that. Just like, if you use the left hand to eat in front of some Indians, guess what will happen? Do the right thing at the right time with appropriate manners is just a respect. If you want to annoy the foreign friends, it is still your choice afterall, but at least you have been informed, so when you CHOOSE TO DO SO, you are not embarrassed.
very agreed with frostig
as captioned.
Does it worth it?
Table manner may not be "unnecessary", but is it worth using so many professors' and students' time, and through forcing them to attend in order to teach?
UOP seems to assume students can't 'handle' themselves and be independent. but by providing everythings for them, just make them never grow up. such orientation sounds strange and taste like those orientation ceremanies we had in early secondary schools.
from my own experience, i need to read much stuffs before getting in university. at first i felt annoyed because no one tell me what to do. but after that, i learn much better how to decide my own studying and living schedule and style, not just work out what is decided by others. i think it's something that worth learning. there won't be any orientation in the real world society, right?
if students don't read student handbook, why not just let them take a lesson? it's meaningelss to force them to do the right thing but letting them no chance of real learning.
Why sometimes even university students don't know how to take care of themselves? in fact, there are too much protection around us throughout our growth that we simply don't need to learn how to take care of ourselves. looking from another angle, protection (with guidelines,rules,etc.) is just another kind of control on both behaviour and mind.
UOP just killed two birds (publicity and student QC) with one stone (UOP).
Does it worth it?
Table manner may not be "unnecessary", but is it worth using so many professors' and students' time, and through forcing them to attend in order to teach?
UOP seems to assume students can't 'handle' themselves and be independent. but by providing everythings for them, just make them never grow up. such orientation sounds strange and taste like those orientation ceremanies we had in early secondary schools.
from my own experience, i need to read much stuffs before getting in university. at first i felt annoyed because no one tell me what to do. but after that, i learn much better how to decide my own studying and living schedule and style, not just work out what is decided by others. i think it's something that worth learning. there won't be any orientation in the real world society, right?
if students don't read student handbook, why not just let them take a lesson? it's meaningelss to force them to do the right thing but letting them no chance of real learning.
Why sometimes even university students don't know how to take care of themselves? in fact, there are too much protection around us throughout our growth that we simply don't need to learn how to take care of ourselves. looking from another angle, protection (with guidelines,rules,etc.) is just another kind of control on both behaviour and mind.
UOP just killed two birds (publicity and student QC) with one stone (UOP).
小卓, the problem here is...
... even if you treat them well, those students don't understand lor...
I don't see why giving a briefing is so annoying to them. If so, maybe lectures are very boring and annoying as well (not all teachers are teaching well in uni), why do they study in universities at all???