辱回漫畫事件,有些人批評人歧視回教徒,有些人批評人歧視敵回教徒。
看了一篇blog文章,題為"一把聲音也太多了",作者說,
> 李怡談到賢仔事件說:“文明社會的價值觀之一,是保護弱者。”
> 在我們的周圍就有這許多因爲人多而聲大,因爲聲大而自以爲理壯的強者。
> 不願意叫他們做弱者,要知道,你在同情弱勢社群的同時,其實已經在逆歧視了。我明白,歧視是一定存在的,問題是多與少而已,大家都是社會文化產物,總會那麽一點點的偏見吧。很多概念,都是因時因地因人而產生互為相對而已。
http://oscafe.blogspot.com/2006/01/blog-post_08.html
我想來想去,到底是不是真的有"逆歧視"這回事。想到現在,現在非常夜深了,先睡覺去。
回應
Those who use the term "逆歧視" are usually jerks
//到底有沒有"逆歧視"?//
No. There is no such thing as "逆歧視".
It is just a "term" created by those who choose and like to discriminate against other people.
Sexists who has gender bias and is prejudice against a particular gender, would say the limitation that put on their jerk-like behavior as "逆歧視".
Whites who have been oppressing Blacks in the US, were saying that they have "逆歧視" because of the affirmative action taken to "rights" the balance because of past wrong. For example, because of the long term oppressions of Blacks in the US, most Blacks would not have the same chance to go to University as Whites (because of the limited of good High Schools that admit Blacks students. In order to have more Blacks to go University right now, the government would set up policy that each University has to have at least 10% of Black students. So, it used to be close to 100% Whites, now would be reduced to 90% Whites. Those White students who were in the last 10% of the group would say there is "逆歧視" because they could no longer get into the same unversity.
Of course, locally, we have homophobic-church-going-Christian-jerks who claimed that their freedom to abuse, insult, discriminate against homosexuals would be limited if there is any law that ban discrimination. And instead of calling it a good thing, as it reduce the among of discrimination in the society, they would also called it "逆歧視" like the racists and sexists jerks.
To make it short, those who use the term "reverse discrimination" or "逆歧視" are usually jerks who discriminated against other people based on bias and prejudice.