我還想多謝那幾位與我一起在地上用粉筆寫「保樹育人」的同學仔。年紀大機械壞，一個人寫好辛苦，一齊寫就好開心。
另我一面派傳單，跟同學談，原來大部份同學都不知道斬樹的計劃。上次偽國際化，很大程度是上情未能下達、下情不能上達（雖然點解要分上下？）所致，而這次斬樹，更差點是先斬後斬。我們會努力讓更多中大人、愛樹的人知道這個消息。繼續保育大樹！

我突然想：既然評議會是廢的，校友何不另起爐灶，建立一個長期監察校園發展的聨席？

●挺好笑的。今天我穿了一件綠色格仔恤衫，通宵後全身的靜脈擴張，真的好像攝青鬼。由公司到中大途中已經有好多人bear下我：這個從陰間來的人，有什麼冤情不能安心投胎？上午十一點幾，得我一個又瘦又黑又憔悴不堪的麻甩佬在派傳單綁黃絲帶，確實係倒米趕客多於一切。一班一班靚仔靚女擦身而過，邊走邊吐出一句「斬樹咪好囉」，內裏包含着對本人的訕笑。

而同樣的攝青外表、笨拙的言行，在這裏竟成為更值得表揚的特徵‧‧‧

●行動完了，吃飯。臭味相投的人在談自己的中大怪癖。無獨有偶，中大最教我們懷念的，就是多藏污納垢的空隙﹝參看梁文道在《中大四十年》的訪問〈野獸兇猛〉﹞。中大是容得下精靈和鬼的地方，是容得下戇居迂迴﹝拒絕速度和效率﹞的地方，余光中筆下的中大，甚至是練仙的地方。

屌，這就是生命。唔使睇harry potter。

把精靈和鬼都趕走了，換來劉遵義和精神病。

阿藹說，星島的記者問她，有同學在bbs投訴我們塗鴉。而吃飯的幾個人都預期，中大遲早會起「小橋流水扶手電梯」。

講真，在這裏的人，多多少少都在空隙裏鑽過快樂過自閉過，知道咩叫做「野」。現在嘈三嘈四
，除了發泄，真係為咗那班訕笑我的靚仔靚女。你拆了牟路思宜圖書館，不單是拆了我的圖書館，更重要是拆了無數後來者進入空隙的機會。以後的人，連遺憾的機會也沒有。

是的，我居然因為想到這些，心生恨意，睡不着。

不如咁，積極d，我地一齊寫中大怪癖呀，用怪癖塞住班中年男人的口。

劉校長是經濟人，見到的可是什麼數字、都會、廊這一類欠缺人文視野的東西，我好害怕，崇基會變成市街，更害怕，中大會變得俗氣。
也許，我們要想想，給辮子姑娘物色新的出沒地了。

Well, that would be a bit too imaginative (hopefully).

Thanks for all of your efforts! I am sorry that I had to leave early because of my own stuff. Take a good rest, all of you! Keep me informed for any further actions. I will try my best to join you guys and help.

It is strange, somehow, as I haven't been studying here for long, but I have always had a special sentiment towards CU, because of a lot of things. I just feel so warm that so many of you are willing to do sth for this school.

ADD OIL!!! Don't give up!

What do they want? To transform CU to a sightseeing spot? Ridiculous!!!!!!

這幾天我都將這兒有關的文章貼到中大新聞組去
( news://news.hkpcug.org/hkteen.university.CUHK ),
中間的一些言論, 對我來說是非常可怕的, 例如那些類似『塗鴉-破壞公物-可恥』之類的論調。一些我一直以為是接近常識的價值, 原來在這些大學生心目中, 根本沒佔上一點兒的位置。看看這些『激進』的校友, 再看看這些『守法』同學, 有點位置錯亂的感覺。

咁既陣容,
有冇朋友會去撩起一下有關保育中大校園的討論??
(對不起,我明日全天要番工)
"挽下手"可能傾埋之後的行動添呀!!

Mar 11, 2006 Sat Mar 11, 2006 Sat
公民意識和人文素養
Time: 15:00-17:00
Organizer: 文化及宗教研究系文化研究學部
Speaker:
龍應台教授
李歐梵教授
黃慧貞教授
Venue: 祖堯堂
Admission: 免費
Enquiries: 26096470

有中大朋友著我們注要, 目前 CDO (校園發展署) 在點數樹木時, 只點一些受本港環保法例規管的大樹, 所以在池旁路, 被釘上號碼的, 只有三十多棵, 可是實在影響的樹木, 如小棵的龍眼, 千層塔, 鴨腳木, 台灣相思等, 都沒有計算在內, 在重新植林時, 亦不會計上在內.

池旁路工程若真的動工, 受影響的大小樹, 超過一百棵!

所以, 當校方說, 校園樹林有增無減時, 其實是因為 CDO 的統計數據裡, 只有受保護的樹木數目, 小樹和外來樹(如很多台灣相思)都沒有計數在內. 可是在重新植林時, 小如掃把棍的樹苗卻算成等同幾十年的一棵樹!

職工, 同學和校友都在說, 樹在減少了, 但校方卻說樹的數目在增加, 這是因為 CDO 的數據的欺人!

所以大家不單要保大樹, 還要保小樹, 它們都是有生命, 是校園生態的一部份!

已把這裡的相關文章forward了給龍應台教授與李歐梵教授。

我今天逃課，會帶同樹的幽魂到會，誰想一起來，2點半係snack bar見。我會準備發言。

Dear Michael,

I do hope there will be a review of this and other major construction
projects on campus. The green space and environmental destruction is truly
disheartening. As you know from our previous conversations, many of us
continue to be greatly concerned about the bricking, paving, guazing, and
wiring over of our campus. One cannot drive 50 meters without coming on
another boarded off area of "hillside maintenance" which we all know means
green space elimination of what have been lovely green areas that are safe.
There have not been landslips on campus of any major sort for a long period.
Plus, so many areas are being "improved," meaning digging and sledging our
sidewalks and causing disruption, noise and dirt to all campus users.
There's one such project going on outside my window here at NAC as I write
this email to you. When is it going to stop and when are all these sites
going to be managed better. If those of us in the staff and professional
ranks littered and left debris around in our buildings and offices like
these work crews do on campus -- be it trash, cigarette butts, cans, plastic
bottles, metal and plastic items etc. -- we would be fired. The campus is
really looking more and more blighted and we are actually doing it to
ourselves. As one long-time, loyal staff person who greatly treasures this
institution and who greets many local and overseas visitors, it is rather
disturbing and, at times, embarrassing, to receive visitors by finding our
way through these various construction sites and messes. When are the
interests of the campus users protected? Who speaks up for the natural
environment in all this "development." How does the policy process reflect
these interests? I would also suggest that senior management visit other
local institutions and see how their campuses are looking and improving
these days. I think any fair-minded person would recognize that our
counterpart institutions are doing a better job on facilities management,
managing the disruption of "campus development" sites an d providing signage
etc. to make it easier and smoother for users and visitors on their
campuses.

I personally feel it is time for a public meeting for interested campus
groups on the whole train station, plaza, and Chung Chi Road "development"
project -- before all the destruction starts again. Is it really reasonable
to have the major public entrance to the University disrupted in this way
for over two years? Has there been any evaluation or quality assessment on
the work done in that area to date?

Just some thoughts for the day. Thank you for your kind consideration.

All best wishes,

Mark

Mark L. Sheldon
Director, Hong Kong Office
Yale-China Association
New Asia College
Cheng Ming Building, Room G07
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, N.T. Hong Kong, SAR CHINA

dear both,
Just one remark i want to make here. I think it is not the problem with the workers, but the endless construction. We should concerns all beings in the campus. so why don't we set up trash and ash tray for our dear workers in a creative way? why don't we help pick up the tash when we see it? That reflect the campus is lack of social space for workers, those working hard to improve our environment (although all these plans are against our will).
also to share with you all another some afterthoughts on hk civil behaviour of yesterday Prof. Lung's seminar on Humanism and Civil Society.
http://www.inmediahk.net/public/article?item_id=101104&group_id=48

Leungpo- NA Fine Arts 1996